iRubric: Local Multinational Business Research Project & Presentation rubric

Student works well with team. Willingly and proactively participates and takes on roles and tasks to fulfill the project. Contributes thoughtfully and respectfully to discussions and decisions. Is proactive in ensuring the group works well together, but does not do all the work.

Student is mostly on-task and fulfills their part of the project with little reminding to focus and participate. Student shares appropriately in group discussions and does not "railroad or derail" the conversation. Student works to effectively participate in fulfilling the assignment, though sometimes it is because they are asked to, not because they have been proactive.

Student fulfills roles and responsibilities
with regular prompting, coaching and redirection, either by peers or teacher. Share of work is not balanced. Demonstrates a limited
understanding of the scope and importance of the group’s work.
Offers minor contributions to the
establishment of the group’s goals and deadlines.
Student inconsistently
follows agreed-upon norms for respectful discussions and
decision-making.

Students do not work well together. Cooperates, but doesn't collaborate. Does not contribute equally in a positive way to the project. Student is distracted and / or distracting. Goes off on tangents. Needs continual redirecting. Student may refuse (directly or passively) to work as a group member. Student may do all the work alone b/c they do not trust other group members to complete their role on the team.

Students demonstrate full knowledge (more than required) by sharing a wide variety (5+) of general information about the company, as well as answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.

Students are at ease with expected answers to all questions. 3 - 4 pieces of general company information (different than background information) has been shared, but students fail to elaborate, and may not be able to elaborate on any questions posed to them.

One or both of the students are uncomfortable with information and are able to answer only rudimentary questions. Information shared did not appear to have been researched in-depth.

Students do not have grasp of general information beyond what anyone could pick up by looking briefly at the company's website; student cannot answer questions about subject. Information shared was clearly not researched in-depth.

Eight or more details about how the company has addressed inclusion, diversity and teamwork and the impact those things have had on the company are clearly addressed in a way that shows both relevancy and a deep level of understanding.

Seven or eight details about how the company has addressed inclusion, diversity and teamwork and the impact those things have had on the company are clearly addressed in a way that shows relevancy and some depth of understanding.

Five or six details about how the company has addressed inclusion, diversity and teamwork and the impact those things have had on the company have not been addressed, but the information is vague, mostly superficial and only slightly relevant.

Information about how the company has addressed inclusion, diversity and teamwork and the impact those things have had on the company have not been addressed at all, or the information is surface-level at best.

Presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.

Presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.

All information has been accurately documented in a properly formatted Works Cited paper.

A correctly formatted business letter has been written to the company and includes a minimum of five thoughtful questions that are created after a thorough evaluation of the company's information.

All information has been documented in a properly formatted Works Cited paper, but may have 1 or 2 errors.

A business letter has been written to the company and includes four thoughtful questions that are created after a thorough evaluation of the company's information. The letter may have one error in the formatting.

All information has been documented in a properly formatted Works Cited paper, but may have 3 or 4 errors.

A business letter has been written to the company and includes three thoughtful questions that are created after a thorough evaluation of the company's information. The letter may have two errors in the formatting.

All information has been documented in a properly formatted Works Cited paper, but formatting may have more than five errors.

A business letter has been written to the company and includes questions that have clearly not been well-researched because the website made that information obvious, or there were no questions at all. The letter has three or more errors in the formatting.