iRubric: Outside Speech Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Outside Speech Review

Students must attend and review an outside speech, evaluating the presenter's verbal and non-verbal delivery skills. Should be between 500 to 750 words.

Rubric Code: KX27A63

By DrJDeTore

Ready to use

Private Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Outside Speech Review
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Unsatisfactory (N/A)
Summary of speaker and details support reviewer's opinion	Excellent Begins with a motivating opening, then provides a brief summary of speaker noting the who, when, where, why, and how; includes writer's evaluation and criterion.	Good Summary is either a little too long or not long enough but provides a motivating opening ;and writer's evaluation with criterion.	Fair Summary is either much too short or much too long; may be vague or tell too much; few details presentation and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion	Unsatisfactory Little or no significant summary; no details from the presentation and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Evaluation of various aspects of presentation including specific references to both verbal and non-verbal delivery skills	Excellent Contains sufficient and knowledgeable evaluation of many aspects of delivery including verbal skills.	Good Contains some evaluation of aspects of the presenter including some specific references to both verbal and non-verbal skills.	Fair Contains insufficient evaluation of aspects of the speaker, vague or abstract without specific references.	Unsatisfactory Too vague and/or missing.
Effective organization and flow	Excellent Review is strongly organized with clear transitions and logical connections that create a sense of being tightly woven together. Well-developed conclusion. Grammar, spelling, and style is college-level.	Good Review is organized and most transitions and connections are clear, but either organization is somewhat lacking or some grammar, spelling or style problems.Excellent conclusion.	Fair Review lacks strong organization ; jumps around too much or lacks effective transitions; not in logical order. Grammar, spelling, style is below college-level. Conclusion is underdeveloped.	Unsatisfactory Review is choppy or incohesive; organization is unclear; few effective transitions or none at all. Many grammatical, spelling, and stylistic errors. Missing conclusion.
Overall Evaluation	Excellent Excellent college-level analysis of presenter with sophisticated use of rhetoric, vocabulary, and specific details. Well-written, supported, and organized. Between 500-750 words.	Good Above average college-level analysis of presenter with mostly sophisticated use of rhetoric, vocabulary, and specific details. Well-written, supported, and organized. Between 500-750 words.	Fair Fair analysis that lacks specificity or is simply too short to do the subject justice. Not college-level. Under 500 words.	Unsatisfactory A failure due to length or execution. Under 500 words.

Keywords:

At the end of the lesson the students will be able to comprehend a film review.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric