iRubric: Personal Experience Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Personal Experience Assignment

Research the approved topic. Submit one 2-3 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the paper. Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.

Rubric Code: H85236

By julieeprice

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Analysis of Personal Experience 100 %
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Description of the Personal Experie 20 pts	Excellent --Topic interesting, appropriate for length of paper & an appropriate topic for analysis. --Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth. --Clear & appropriate organization	Good --Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for analysis. --Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking depth or complexity. --Organization, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.	Fair --Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for analysis. --Support for thesis barely sufficient --Organization, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.	Poor --Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for analysis. --Support for thesis weak --Organization, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Application of Propaganda/Persuasiv 20 pts	Excellent --2 or more theories applied --Theories cited properly and applied appropriately -Sources reliable and properly cited. --Sufficient information relevant to topic -Research Logical conclusions drawn	Good --2 or more theories applied -. Citation errors minor. --Most information relevant to thesis. --Sufficient information provided --Research of sufficient depth.	Fair --Failed to cite at least 2 theories --Source reliability questionable. --Some information relevant to thesis. --Information provided to support some elements of topic .	Poor --Failed to attach theories to example --Source reliability questionable. --Some information relevant to thesis, but student fails to include specific theoretical research
Propaganda Techniques Applied 20 pts	Excellent -several techniques described accurately and applied to example -discussion includes definition of the technique and effectiveness -student defines white, black and grey propaganda concepts and relates to example -students defines agitative and passive propaganda and relates to example	Good -a few techniques described accurately and applied to example -discussion includes definition of the technique but may not include analysis or discussion of effectiveness -student discusses white, black and grey propaganda concepts but may not exhibit a clear understanding or may not be able to apply to example. -	Fair -1 or 2 techniques described accurately and applied to example -discussion includes technique but may not include definition,analysis or discussion of effectiveness -student fails to discuss or misidentifies white, black and grey propaganda concepts	Poor - 1 or no techniques applied to example -discussion includes technique but may not include definition,analysis or discussion of effectiveness -student fails to discuss or misidentifies white, black and grey propaganda concepts
Analysis 20 pts	Excellent -clear, logical discussion of several propaganda theories, techniques and concepts -appropriate application and discussion of desired results and effectiveness -student offers specific improvements to maximize effectiveness of message	Good - discussion of propaganda theories, techniques and concepts -appropriate application and discussion of desired results and effectiveness -student suggests minor or vague improvements to maximize effectiveness of message	Fair -minimal discussion of propaganda theories, techniques and concepts - a cursory discussion of desired results or effectiveness -no suggestions for improvements	Poor -omission of discussion of propaganda theories, techniques and concepts - little or no discussion of desired results or effectiveness -no suggestions for improvements
AP/MLA style 20 pts	Excellent --Assignment is written using AP style and MLA citations in both paper and bibliography. -- No errors in format or punctuation,precise word choice. --No spelling or capitalization errors	Good --Assignment is written using AP style and MLA citations in paper and bibliography. -- 2 errors in format, citation or punctuation. -- Fairly effective word choice. --No more than 2 spelling or capitalization errors.	Fair --Assignment loosely follows AP style with MLA citations. Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. - Correct word choice. -- More than 3 format, spelling, punctuation or capitalization errors.	Poor -Assignment does not adhere to AP style and MLA citations.Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- More than than 4 errors in format, spelling, punctuation or capitalization errors.

Keywords:

Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric