Skip to main content

iRubric: Social Work Group Project Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Social Work Group Project Rubric 
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your sociology presentation project. This rubric will used to score your project. For this project, you will choose a a current social welfare service program (TANF, EITC, FS, Medicare and Medicaid, WIC, Veteran’s Benefits, Obahama Care, etc.), and present an overview of that program. Your group’s task will be to develop a publicly-accessible web page about program.
Rubric Code: DX8629A
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

(N/A)

Identification of the Program

Must discuss: History, why the program was developed, what does it do and who does it serve

Fair

Lacks a clear description of the potential problem by identifying (2) causes and perceived consequences.
Poor

Provides an insufficient description of the problem - by identifying (1) or none of the causes or consequences.
Good

Adequately describes the potential problem by indentifying (3) causes (human and natural) and identified (3)likely consequences.
Excellent

Clearly and thoroughly describes the problem by identifying (4) causes (human and natural) and identifies (4) likely consequences.
Analysis

Utilize the policy analysis framework to critique the program

Fair

Includes (2) example of evidence. <BR>
<BR>
The presentation may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the data.
Poor

Does not provide an example or provides inaccurate information about evidence.<BR>
<BR>
The presentation may contain factual errors regarding the interpretation of the data.
Good

Includes (3) examples of the evidence in the discussion. <BR>
<BR>
The interpretation of the historical evidence is largely accurate.
Excellent

Includes (4) examples of evidence in the discussion. <BR>
<BR>
The interpretation of the evidence is accurate and written in a clear and coherent manner.
International Analysis

Pick two countries and explain to they approach the program and how their approach and outcomes are different from the U.S.

Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Presentation Skills

Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent
Proper Citation & Time Management

Whatever your argument, you will cite appropriate supporting data from your sources. Any information taken from any source material needs to be properly cited (MLA format) and included in your bibliography.

Fair

Sources are cited inconsistently or not at all. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material.
Poor

Sources are not cited. There is either incorrect or no clear formatting of the source material.
Good

Sources are cited inconsistently. The formatting of cited literature is largely correct and consistent. Not all of the sources cited were actually used.
Excellent

All appropriate source material is correctly cited using the APA format -includes a bibliography p time requirement.
Linkage and Resources

Includes links and resources from the community

Fair
Poor
Good
Excellent



Keywords:
  • Presentation Rubric







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224