iRubric: Detecting Fake News rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Detecting Fake News

Students will recognize "Fake" news, and a process that can be used to prepare students to avoid it. Must read articles associated with this assignment and be able to answer the question accordingly

Rubric Code: A235832

By KlAckman

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Detecting Fake News Students will recognize "Fake" news, and a process that can be used to prepare students to avoid it. Must read articles associated with this assignment and be able to answer the question accordingly
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent All components are answered completely, and comparison shows actual reading of assigned article(s) through the use of quotes. 4 pts
ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION How much of the assignment was completed? Did the student find the correct information that was needed to complete/ Such as additional website, sharing of how they found it what process they used	Poor Less than 1/2 of the items to be found and discussed 1. did not find appropriate website 2. did not discuss how the process was to finding such website 3. did not describe how the new website will be useful in finding new	Fair 1/2 of the items to be found and discussed. 1. Website found. did not list how they found it and what process used	Good 3/4 of the items were found and discussed 1. Website was found 2. listed how they found 3. did not describe how this information will be useful in detecting fake news	Excellent The Find and share a additional site that helps students detect fake news through the internet The Share not just what you found, but the process on how you found this. all items were done at 100%
ACCURACY How much of the assignment was done right? Was student able to show the comparing and contrast of articles . Did the student realte information back to fake news detections	Poor Less than 1/2 of the assignment was done correctly. 1. was not able to complete the compare and contrast 2. Did not use The Beers/Probst article 3. did not discuss the strength and weakness fully	Fair At least 1/2 of the assignment was done correctly. 1. did use the Beers/Probst article 2. did not discuss strength and weakness 3. did not compare and contrast	Good 3/4 of the assignment was done correctly. 1. was able to use Beers/Probst article 2. did compare and contrast 3. did not list strengths and weakness	Excellent Was able to compare and contrast your selection must use: the Beers/Probst article What are the strengths and weaknesses of each? Assignment complete to 100% accuracy
LEGIBILITY Was the students expressing of ideas and thoughts understandable. Did it reflect back to main topic of Detecting fake news.	Poor Not legible. Hard to read. Ideas expressed are difficult to understand.	Fair Slightly legible. Writing illustrates little thought or preparation.	Good Mostly neat and legible Writing illustrates some thought and preparation.	Excellent Able to express understanding of assignment Writing illustrates a lot of thought and preparation. The student was able use multiple examples and tech tools to be used in detecting fake news.
Peer Review The student worked at what level of their ability?	Poor Student did not respond to peer	Fair Some effort was made, Did respond to peer? Did not list what was helpful or question	Good Responded to at least one peer. Did complete the finding of what was helpful Forgot to ask a question	Excellent Respond to at least one other peer's posting Ask student if they found a certain item particular helpful also can you state the item yourself on your page and 1 more peers. that you the student found helpful

Keywords:

Homework

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric