Skip to main content
iRubric: Adopt-An-Artifact Project rubric

iRubric: Adopt-An-Artifact Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Adopt-An-Artifact Project rubric 
Informative Group Presentation
Teams research an ancient artifact, gather information, determine its relevance in its historical setting and bearing upon biblical literature. Teams give a 6-8 minute presentation that may take a variety of forms but must include an electronic student study sheet..
Rubric Code: P93C48
By RenateHood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Informative Presentation:
Team:
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality of Project
40 %

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully informed audience about the artifact.
Students were given sufficient information to connect the artifact to its ancient setting and the NT text.
Poor

Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not fully connect the artifact to its ancient setting and the NT text.
Fair

Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear. Project did not fully connect the artifact to its ancient setting and the NT text.
Good

Project was extremely organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project fully connected the artifact to its ancient setting and the NT text.
Excellent

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow.
Project fully connected the artifact to its ancient setting and the NT text; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation
20 %

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.
Poor

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. The team members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Fair

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. The team members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Good

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. The team members were
able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.
Excellent

Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. The team members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.
Group work - Written report
5 %

Team members stayed on task in the time leading up to the presentation and asked questions when needed.
Poor

Did not use time wisely when working together as a group. The team did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting by professor.
Fair

Needs improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group. The team basically stayed on task, but was not fully focused on project. Professor may have had to speak to the group to keep them on task or problem solve/do conflict resolution.
Good

Used time wisely when working together in group. The team was focused on task.
Asked questions when needed.
Excellent

Group stayed on task the entire time leading up to the project. The team was organized and able to complete project.
Preparedness
15 %

Students did not read from their slides or paper. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.
Poor

Students did not seem prepared to present.
Fair

Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.
Good

Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.
Excellent

Students showed that they were completely prepared and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.
Student handout
10 %

The team prepared a clear and informative electronic student study sheet. The study sheet was submitted on the due date.
Poor

The team did not have an electronic student study sheet.
Fair

The team had an electronic student study sheet but turned it in late.
Good

The team turned in an electronic student study sheet on time but the study sheet lacked in content and organization.
Excellent

The team prepared a clear and informative electronic student study sheet. The study sheet was submitted on the due date.
Time Limit
10 %

Proper use of time.
Poor

Presentation was either way too short (5 mins or less) or way too long (10 mins or longer without having had permission for videos not to count for time).
Fair
Good
Excellent

Perfect use of allotted time.
Total
100 %

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent



Keywords:
  • Information presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16