- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Community Health Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Community Health Project Research APA Paper- Adapted from iRubric: Research paper rub Each student will write a (10-12 double-spaced pages) research paper on a topic concerning health in our community (e.g., diabetes, obesity, tobacco control, chronic disease, health inequities, communicable diseases, family planning, immunizations, emerging populations, environment, social determinants of health, disabilities, etc). I must approve topics beforehand. Your paper needs to include a bibliography citing at least 5 credible sources in an acceptable citation format (e.g., MLA, Chicago Style, etc.). Rubric Code: L59437 By Tellechea Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Community Health Project
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Needs Improvement (N/A)
Quality of research	Excellent --Cited 5 or more sources --Sources reliable and properly cited. --All information relevant to thesis. --Sufficient information provided to support all elements of thesis. --Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.	Good --Cited 3 sources --Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor. --Most information relevant to thesis. --Sufficient information provided to support most elements of thesis. --Research of sufficent depth.	Needs Improvement --Failed to cite 3 sources --Source reliablility questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to thesis. --Information provided to support some elements of thesis. --Surface research.
Content	Excellent --Thesis interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. --Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth. --Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment. --Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.	Good --Thesis somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper. --Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity. --Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.	Needs Improvement --Thesis too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research. --Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or. --Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Bibliography	Excellent --All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- No more than three errors in format or punctuation.	Good --All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- Four to nine errors in format or punctuation.	Needs Improvement --Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- More than than 10 errors in format or punctuation.