Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Energy Sources Research Project rubric

iRubric: Energy Sources Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Energy Sources Research Project Earth's Energy Sources This project is worth a total of 70 points Students may work in groups of 2 to research an energy source. They will create a Google Slides Presentation to show the energy source they were assigned and share information in a presentation to the class. Participation will be based on teacher notes and observations throughout the process. Rubric Code: AX93WW2 By eseman Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Research - 20 Points Poss
	Outstanding 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Research Name of Energy Source Images Related to Energy Source Questions about energy source How does this energy source work? What are its advantages What are its disadvantages How does this energy source affect the economy How does this energy source affect the environment other important information you discovered in your research	Outstanding Students researched selected topic and answered all of their own questions. Information is relevant, detailed, and summarized in their own words. Writing guidelines were followed and the paper was turned in on time. 20-16 pts	Good Student researched selected topic and answered 5 or 6 of their own questions. Most information is relevant, detailed, and summarized in their own words. Most of the writing guidelines were followed and the paper was turned in on time. 15-11 pts	Fair Student researched topic, but did not clearly answer all the questions and/or some information was plagiarized. Information is scattered, vague, unorganized, and/or missing. Many of the writing guidelines were ignored and/or the paper was turned in late. 10-6 pts	Poor Student did minimal research. Less than half of the questions were answered clearly and/or much of it was plagiarized. Information is scattered, vague, unorganized, and/or missing. Many of the writing guidelines were not followed and/or the paper was turned in late. 4-1 pts	Unacceptable Student did little or no research. Many of the focus questions were not answered and/or were partially answered and/or plagiarized. Writing guidelines were not followed and/or the paper was late or not turned in at all. <BR> 0 points
Google Slides- 30 Points Possible
	Outstanding 30 pts	Good 25 pts	Fair 19 pts	Poor 14 pts	Unacceptable 9 pts
Slides Content Should highlight the major points from the Research Template.<BR> DO NOT PLAGIARIZE!<BR>	Outstanding The Slides support all of the major research questions and is presented on time and in an organized fashion. 20-18 points	Good The Slides support only 5 of the 6 major research questions or is presented on time and in a somewhat organized fashion. 17-14 pts	Fair The Slides support only 4 or 5 of the major research questions and/or is presented in rather unorganized fashion and/or was turned in late. 13-11pts	Poor The Slides support only half of the major research questions and/or is presented in an unorganized way and/or was turned in late. 10-8 points	Unacceptable The Slides support less than half of the major research questions and is presented in an unorganized way and/or the work presented is plagiarized and/or not turned in. 7-0 points
Images Include at least one image that supports understanding of the energy source.	Outstanding One or more graphs showing pertinent information is included. Each graph is neat and and easily understood.<BR> 5 points	Good At least one image showing pertinent information is included. Each image is somewhat neat and/or somewhat easily understood. 4 pts	Fair At least one image showing somewhat pertinent information is included. One or more of the images is only somewhat neat and/or is confusing. 3 points	Poor An image is either not included or shows non-pertinent information. Any images shown are sloppy and/or confusing. 2 points	Unacceptable An image is not included. <BR> 1-0 points
Attractiveness	Outstanding The Slides have an element of creativity and is not just a list of facts. It is neatly done and pleasing to the eye. It shows obvious pride in the work. 5 pts	Good The Slides have an element of creativity and is not just a list of facts. It is neatly done and somewhat pleasing to the eye. It shows some pride in the work. 4 pts	Fair The Slides show some creativity and/or is mainly a list of facts, that may contain errors. It is rather sloppily put together, showing little pride in the work. 3 pts	Poor The Slides show no creativity and/or is just a list of facts, that contain errors. It is very sloppily put together, showing no pride in the work. 2 pts	Unacceptable The Slides show no creativity and is just a list of facts, that contain errors. It is either sloppily put together, showing no pride in the work, or is non-existent. 1-0 pts
Presentation - 15 Points Possible
	Exceeds 15 pts	Good 13 pts	Fair 11 pts	Poor 9 pts	Unacceptable 7 pts
Presentation	Exceeds The presentation shows a clear understanding of the material presented. Student speaks clearly and effectively, showing obvious signs of preparation. 15-14pts	Good The presentation shows an understanding of the material presented. Student speaks somewhat clearly and effectively, showing signs of preparation.<BR> 13-12 points	Fair The presentation shows some understanding of the material presented. Student speaks somewhat clearly and/or effectively, showing some signs of preparation. 11-10 pts	Poor The presentation shows little understanding of the material presented. Student does not speak very clearly and/or effectively, showing very little signs of preparation. 9-8 points	Unacceptable The presentation shows no understanding of the material presented. Student does not speak clearly or effectively, showing no sign of preparation, or does not present at all. 7-0pts
Participation - 5 Points Possible
	Exceeds 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts
On task/Participation	Exceeds Student was on task, working diligently every day during class-time, and worked well with team members. 5 points	Good Student was on task, working somewhat diligently most every day during class-time, and worked well with team members. 4 pts	Fair Student was on task at least half of the time, but did not work very diligently and/or very well with team members during class-time and/or was absent a day or two during this project. 3pts	Poor Student was on task less than half of the class-time, not working diligently and/or very well with team members and/or was absent more than two days during this project. 2 points	Unacceptable Student was off task most of the time and/or was absent for more than half of the project. Team members could not count on this student for help. 1-0 pts

Keywords:

advantages, disadvantages, energy, natural resources, by-product, pro/con argument, renewable/non-renewable,

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Geology rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16