Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Topic Discussion/Reflection Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Topic Discussion/Reflection Paper
Reading/Video Response Writing Rubric
Intro to Phil Discussion/Reflection Questions (2 pp min.)
Rubric Code:
NXCB46W
By
markhudson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Philosophy
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Topic Disc. Reflection Paper rubric
EXCELLENT
5 pts
GOOD
4.5 pts
FAIR
4 pts
WEAK
3.5 pts
ACCEPTABLE
3 pts
Organization & Mechanics
EXCELLENT
Writing is fluent and interesting to read. Discussion is backed up with evidence from the video. Response is to the point, in complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar.
GOOD
Writing is fluent and mostly interesting; discussion could be supported more strongly, spelling errors are minimal and grammar is mostly accurate.
FAIR
Minimal details from the video included. Conclusion or an opinion is not clear. Writing is not interesting.
WEAK
Missing one or more of the following: paragraphs, details from video, opinion.
ACCEPTABLE
Ideas & Content
EXCELLENT
Information is accurate and response shows good insight of the video. The response is complete. Discussion makes a logical conclusion or an opinion is offered.
GOOD
Information is accurate. Discussion makes a logical conclusion or an opinion is offered. Missing an insightful analysis of the video.
FAIR
Information provided is generally accurate but no insight or analysis is offered.
WEAK
Information is not accurate. Not insight, analysis or opinion is offered.
ACCEPTABLE
Reflection
EXCELLENT
The response is very specific and related theme of judgement. Many of the ideas are clearly supported with details/evidence.
GOOD
The response is somewhat specific and related to the theme of judgement. Some of the ideas are clearly supported.
FAIR
The response is not related to the theme of judgement. The ideas are not clearly supported.
WEAK
There is no response to the theme of judgement. Writing is completely off-topic.
ACCEPTABLE
Keywords:
writing, journals, essays,
Subjects:
English
History
Philosophy
Social Sciences
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Reflection
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.