Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Proposal and Presentation rubric

iRubric: Research Proposal and Presentation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Proposal and Presentation 
Research Proposal and Presentation
The rubic is used to appraise the initial research proposal presented in writing and class presentation by MBA students regarding their final case study analysis.
Rubric Code: ZX9BCCC
By yaoyaoyaohan
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Proposal & Presentation
  Excellent

10 pts

Competent

7 pts

Needs Improvement

3 pts

Incomplete

1 pts

Introduction

Excellent

An intriguing introduction based on facts leads clearly into the research proposal.
Competent

A fairly well formulated introduction with some evidence to support the topic leads into the research proposal.
Needs Improvement

Introduction is not well constructed, uninteresting, or does not lead into the research proposal.
Incomplete

Lacks a proper introduction.
Problem Statement

Excellent

Stated the research problem clearly at the introductory part and provided motivation for undertaking the research.  
Competent

Fairly well posed statement of the problem that provides evidence but the evidence is not as strong as it could be.
Needs Improvement

Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks quality evidence to support the problem
Incomplete

Lacks a proper statement of the problem. Evidence presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Study

Excellent

Very clearly stated purpose of the study and demonstrated its potential value.
Competent

Fairly well stated purpose of the study but did not demonstrate its potential value.
Needs Improvement

Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or the value is not stated.
Incomplete

Lacks a purpose of the study statement.
Research Questions

Excellent

Well-stated research questions, and is reflected on the title and on the research problem.
Competent

Fairly-stated research questions, and is quite reflected on the title, and the research problem.
Needs Improvement

Stated research question is unclear and vague; not reflected to the title and is not related to the research problem.
Incomplete

Lacks research questions.
Literature Review

Excellent

Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature in the area, and of prior work on the specific research problem. Mentioned at least 1 theory.
Competent

Demonstrated basic knowledge of literature or previous research in the area, but did not mention any theories.
Needs Improvement

Unclearly mentioned some previous work in the area.
Incomplete

Did not mention any previous research, literature, or theories.
References

Excellent

References are given for more than 2 relevant sources. Appropriate Harvard citation style is used.
Competent

References are given for 2 relevant sources. Appropriate Harvard citation style is used.
Needs Improvement

References are given for more than 1 relevant source. Appropriate Harvard citation style is used.
Incomplete

No references are provided, or they are not cited correctly.
Writing Mechanics

Excellent

Very well written proposal with few grammatical errors. Adheres to all the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Competent

Well written proposal with few grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Needs Improvement

Fairly written proposal that lacks clarity; has poor transition sentences. There are several grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Incomplete

Poorly written paper that lacks organization. There are multiple grammatical errors. Fails to adhere to the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Presentation Skill

Excellent

Excellent eye contact, no distracting gestures, appropriate volume, clear and consistent enunciation. Creative and charismatic.
Competent

Good eye contact, no distracting gestures, usually has appropriate
volume, overall clear enunciation.
Needs Improvement

Inconsistent with eye contact, volume, and enunciation. Obvious distracting mannerism(s).
Incomplete

Poor eye contact, volume too low or loud, poor enunciation.
Visual Aids

Excellent

The presentation includes appropriate and easily understood visual aids, which complement and enhance the presented information.
Competent

The presentation includes appropriate and easily understood visual aids, which complement and enhance the presented information.
Needs Improvement

The presentation includes appropriate visual aids, but these are too few, or are difficult to understand, or the presenter does not

refer to or explain them.
Incomplete

The presentation includes no visual aids. Or the visual aids do not complement the information.
Overall Presentation Quality

Excellent

Excellent use was made of the student's presentation time (4 minutes). Each section of the written proposal was mentioned. English quality was advanced.
Competent

Good use was made of the student's presentation time (4 minutes). Each section of the written proposal was mentioned. English quality was acceptable.
Needs Improvement

Acceptable use was made of the student's presentation time (4 minutes). Most sections of the written proposal was mentioned. English quality was inconsistent.
Incomplete

The presentation was not timed appropriate. Some portions of the proposal were ignored. English was difficult to understand.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study

Excellent

The scope has been clearly identified and has clearly delimited the study into more specific.
Competent

The scope has been somewhat identified and has not quite delimited the study.
Needs Improvement

The scope has vaguely identified and it does not give a clear limitation of the study.
Incomplete

No scope and delimitation established on the study.
Theoretical Framework

Excellent

Three (3) theories with authors; with bearing on the study; a theory has a name, if none, it is a proposition, model, etc.
Competent

Two (2) theories with authors; with bearing on the study; a theory has a name, if none, it is a proposition, model, etc.
Needs Improvement

The theory(ies) included do/es not have a bearing on the study; irrelevant.
Incomplete

No theories included.
Research Design

Excellent

The research design is carefully selected and described and also includes how is it to be used in the study.
Competent

The research design is carefully selected and described and also includes how is it to be used in the study.
Needs Improvement

The research design is carefully selected and described and also includes how is it to be used in the study.
Incomplete

The research design is carefully selected and described and also includes how is it to be used in the study.
Enter Title

Excellent
Competent
Needs Improvement
Incomplete
Enter Title

Excellent
Competent
Needs Improvement
Incomplete



Keywords:
  • research proposal


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16