iRubric: Oral Presentation for History rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oral Presentation for History

Oral communication takes many forms. This rubric is specifically designed to evaluate oral presentations of a single speaker at a time. An oral answer to a single question not designed to be structured into a presentation does not readily apply to this rubric.

Rubric Code: ZX7536B

By thelozo

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Oral Presentation Rubric B
	4 10 pts	3 7 pts	2 4 pts	1 1 pts
Organization	4 -Specific introduction and conclusion. -Sequenced material within the body -Cohesive presentation content - Speech/oral presentation is logical, interesting and sequenced so it is easily followed.	3 -Good introduction and conclusion -Somewhat sequenced material within the body -Somewhat cohesive presentation content - Speech/oral presentation is somewhat logical, fairly interesting and easy to follow.	2 -May have either an introduction or conclusion -Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent -fractured presentation content --Speech/oral presentation is illogical and hard to follow.	1 -No introduction and conclusion -No sequence in material - Very little/no presentation content which is fractured. -Speech/oral presentation is illogical and can not be followed.
Delivery	4 -Good posture -Eye contact with the audience almost all of the time -Appropriate gesture and expression -Body language is engaging and fluid.	3 -Good posture -Frequent eye contact with the audience -Mostly appropriate gesture and expression -Body language is somewhat engaging and fluid.	2 -Intermittent good posture Moved throughout presentation -Almost no eye contact with the audience -Inappropriate gesture and expression	1 -Poor posture -Seldom eye contact with the audience -Not enough or too much gesture and expression
Content	4 -Student clearly states their thesis statement and effectively expands upon it. - Demonstrates full knowledge by answering all questions with explanations and elaborations. -Historical and current examples are coherently explained	3 -Student states their thesis statement and generally expands upon it. - Demonstrates some knowledge by answering most questions with explanations and some elaborations. -Historical and current examples are somewhat coherently explained	2 -Student does not state their thesis statement very well. -Student's misconceptions about subject knowledge is obvious by not being able to answer questions well. -Historical and current examples are explained to show some understanding.	1 -Students do not state any thesis statement. -Students still sound confused on their topic and can not answer questions. -Historical and current examples are vaguely explained or not explained at all.
Preparedness	4 -The student was prepared to present.	3 -The student was prepared but unorganized.	2 -The student was not ready to present.	1 -The student was not present or did not present.
Powerpoint	4 -Visual aid is pleasing and contributes to the overall message. -Visual aid is very effectively explained as part of the contrast or comparison or both.	3 -Visual aid is nice and somewhat contributes to the overall message. -Visual aid is effectively explained as part of the contrast or comparison.	2 -Visual aid is present but does not contribute to the overall message. -Visual aid is vaguely explained as part of the contrast or comparison.	1 -Visual aid may or may not be present. -Visual aid has nothing to do with message. -Visual aid is not explained or explained very little in context of the message

Keywords:

Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric