iRubric: PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

A rubric to assess students powerpoint ability and then presenting their powerpoint.

Rubric Code: Z937W2

By Cachao

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Grading Rubric
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts
Introduction and Conclusion	Excellent The Introduction and Conclusion greatly strengthen the presentation	Good The introduction and conclusion add to the powerpoint.	Fair The introduction and conclusion do not add to the powerpoint.	Poor The Introduction and Conclusion are not tied to the essential purpose of the presentation.
Organization of Powerpoint	Excellent Careful organization exists throughout the powerpoint as a whole. Slides are not not over-worded	Good Organization is evident throughout but has at least one flaw and there is some over-wording	Fair Lapses in organization exist and much over-wording is apparent	Poor Random or weak organization exists much over-wording
Powerpoint/Graphics	Excellent Slides are attractive. Text is legible and consistent.Graphics and effects are used throughout to enhance presentation. Information is at the advanced level and consistently supports images.	Good Slides are attractive. Text is legible and consistent. More than half of the slides use graphics and effects to enhance presentation. Information adequately supports images.	Fair Slides are legible and consistent.Amount of text is too great for the amount of space provided. Less than half the slides have graphics or effects. Information supports images at times.	Poor The slides are not legible , not consistent. The amount of text is too great for the space provided. There is little use of graphics or effects. The information does not consistently support images.
Content- Accuracy	Excellent All required slides included with ADDITIONAL information. Topic is discussed clearly and adequate points are made. Material Presented no errors	Good All required slides with relevant information. Topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. One error	Fair Missing some slides or relevant information. Topic is slightly discussed but more material is needed. Two or more errors	Poor Many slides missing or less slides OR slides do not contain relevant information. Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on. Many errors
Overall Presentation	Excellent Presentation is interesting and well executed. Presentation indicates excellent effort and does not exceed time limit.	Good Presentation is interesting and mainly well executed Presentation indicates good effort. It goes overtime more than 1 minute.	Fair Presentation is somewhat interesting. Presentation indicates fair effort. It goes overtime more than 2 minutes.	Poor Presentation is poorly prepared and shows little to no effort. It goes overtime more than 4 minutes
Responses	Excellent The presenter was able to address questions in a manner that displayed depth of understanding of the topic.	Good The presenter was able to address questions in a manner that displayed an adequate understanding of the topic	Fair The presenter was able to address questions in a manner that some understanding of the topic.	Poor The presenter was not able to address questions in a manner that displayed any understanding of the topic.
Oral Presentation	Excellent Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice and does not read from screen. Speaker is able to speak in addition to the slides.	Good Speaker presents in a loud and clear voice but sometimes reads from the screen	Fair Speaker presents in a voice that is sometimes clear but constantly refers to the presentation	Poor Speaker does not present in a loud or clear voice and reads simply from the screen.
Bibliography	Excellent Included with no less than 5 references in APA format	Good Included with no less than 4 references in APA format	Fair Included with no less than 4 references in APA format	Poor Included with no less than 2 references in APA format
Quality of the discussion questions	Excellent Questions were provocative and elicited much discussion. 3 questions	Good Questions elicited discussion, 2 questions	Fair Questions did not elicit much discussion, 1 question	Poor Questions did not elicit discussion.

Keywords:

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric