Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Riddle team presentation rubric

iRubric: Riddle team presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Riddle team presentation Mark presentation Students will work in teams and present a well-researched riddle in the Gospel of John. The presentation may take on various forms, must have an interactive element, must evidence thorough research, and may not exceed 20 minutes. Teams have 10-minute meetings with Dr. Hood to discuss details of the riddle presentation and must also prepare an electronic handout a week in advance. Rubric Code: YXBA6BW By RenateHood Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Riddle team presentation Team:
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Quality of Presentation 40 % Presentation was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. The presentation fully informed the audience about the riddle in the Gospel of John in it's narrative and social context. Students were given sufficient information to understand the methodology and the subsequent reading in the Gospel of John.	Excellent Presentation was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. The presentation fully informed the audience about the riddle in the Gospel of John in it's narrative and social context. Students were given sufficient information to understand the methodology and the subsequent reading in the Gospel of John; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.	Good Presentation was organized, interesting, and easy to follow. The presentation informed the audience about the riddle in the Gospel of John in it's narrative and social context. Students were given sufficient information to understand adequately the methodology and the subsequent reading in the Gospel of John.	Fair Presentation was fairly organized, interesting, and somewhat easy to follow. The presentation somewhat informed the audience about the riddle in the Gospel of John in it's narrative and/or social context but left areas unclear. Students were given insufficient information to understand the methodology and the subsequent reading in the Gospel of John.	Poor Presentation not organized, or interesting, and/or hard to follow; Or the presentation did not inform the audience about the riddle in the Gospel of John in it's narrative and/or social context. Students were given insufficient or unclear information to understand the methodology and the subsequent reading in the Gospel of John.
Classroom Presentation 20 % Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.	Excellent Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.	Good Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.	Fair Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.	Poor Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Group work and Preparation 10 % Group members stayed on task in the time leading up to the presentation and asked questions when needed. Office meeting with Dr. Hood was well-prepared, attended by all, and used efficiently.	Excellent Group stayed on task the entire time leading up to the project. Group was organized and able to complete project. Office meeting with Dr. Hood was very well-prepared, attended by all, and used highly efficiently.	Good Used time wisely when working together in group. Group was focused on task. Asked questions when needed. Office meeting with Dr. Hood was well-prepared, attended by all, and used efficiently.	Fair Needs improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group. Group basically stayed on task, but was not fully focused on project. Professor had to speak to the group to keep them on task or problem solve/do conflict resolution. Office meeting with Dr. Hood somewhat prepared, and/or attended by all or some, and/or used efficiently.	Poor Did not use time wisely when working together as a group. Group did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting by professor. Office meeting with Dr. Hood was ill-prepared, and/or attended by few or none, and/or used inefficiently.
Preparedness 10 % Students did not read from their slides or paper. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.	Excellent Students showed that they were completely prepared and that they had rehearsed before the presentation. They demonstrated knowledge of the subject area.	Good Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.	Fair Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have rehearsed more as a team.	Poor Students did not seem prepared to present.
Electronic student handout 10 % Group prepared a clear and informative electronic student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.	Excellent Group prepared a clear and informative electronic student handout. The handout was submitted on the due date.	Good The group turned in an electronic student handout on time but the handout lacked in content and organization.	Fair The group had an electronic student handout but turned it in late.	Poor The group did not have an electronic student handout.
Time Limit 10 % Proper use of time.	Excellent Perfect use of allotted time.	Good Good use of time.	Fair Acceptable use of time.	Poor Presentation was either way too short (10 mins or less) or way too long (25 mins or longer).
Total 100 %	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor

Keywords:

Information presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Business rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98