iRubric: AP MICROECONOMICS Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

AP MICROECONOMICS Project

AP MICROECONOMICS

STUDY GUIDE FOR Final Exam

Rubric Code: Y252855

By malanosm

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

STUDY GUIDE
	Exceeds Expectations 5 pts	Proficient 4 pts	Satisfactory 3 pts	Developing 2 pts	Does Not Meet Expectations 1 pts
Definitions	Exceeds Expectations Pertinent terms from all 6 units are included. Definitions are fully accurate, use precise economic vocabulary, and clearly show deep understanding of each concept. No errors or vague wording.	Proficient Definitions from all 6 units are included and mostly accurate. Minor wording issues, but economic meaning is clear. Uses appropriate terminology with few small errors.	Satisfactory Most key terms from the 6 units are included. Definitions show basic understanding, but some are incomplete, oversimplified, or slightly inaccurate. Limited use of correct economic language.	Developing Several key terms from the 6 units are missing or incorrectly defined. Definitions show confusion or misunderstanding of economic concepts. Little use of proper terminology.	Does Not Meet Expectations Few terms included. Definitions are mostly incorrect, unclear, or missing, showing minimal understanding of the 6 units.
Formulas	Exceeds Expectations All formulas from all 6 units are included. Formulas are written correctly, clearly labeled, and use proper AP-style notation. Demonstrates strong understanding of when and how each formula is used.	Proficient Formulas from all 6 units are included and mostly accurate. Minor notation or labeling errors, but formulas are usable and reflect correct economic concepts.	Satisfactory Most required formulas from the 6 units are included. Some formulas have small errors or missing labels and may need correction to earn full AP exam credit.	Developing Several formulas from the 6 units are missing or incorrect. Errors show confusion about how or when formulas are used on the AP exam.	Does Not Meet Expectations Few formulas included. Most are incorrect or missing, showing little understanding of formulas needed for AP exam questions.
Graphs	Exceeds Expectations All required graphs from all 6 units included, correctly labeled (axes, curves, equilibrium). Matches AP FRQ expectations.	Proficient All required graphs included for all units; minor labeling or placement errors.	Satisfactory Most required graphs included for all units; minor labeling or placement errors.	Developing Missing graphs or incorrectly drawn	Does Not Meet Expectations Few correctly labeled graphs or not correct graphs are included.
Analysis & Explanation	Exceeds Expectations Consistently uses correct AP FRQ explanation patterns across all 6 units (clear cause → effect → outcome). Explanations use precise microeconomic vocabulary and correctly connect changes in variables (e.g., incentives, costs, revenue, profit, efficiency). Would earn full FRQ explanation points.	Proficient Uses AP-appropriate explanations for all 6 units, but some responses lack depth or skip a small reasoning step. Logic is mostly correct and would earn most FRQ explanation points.	Satisfactory Uses FRQ-style explanations for most units, but reasoning is sometimes incomplete, vague, or inconsistent. Would earn partial FRQ credit.	Developing Limited use of proper AP FRQ explanation patterns. Explanations often miss cause-and-effect or misuse microeconomic vocabulary. Would earn little FRQ credit.	Does Not Meet Expectations Explanations do not follow AP FRQ reasoning. Statements are incorrect, unsupported, or descriptive only. Would earn no FRQ explanation credit.
Examples	Exceeds Expectations Includes relevant and accurate example FRQ questions for all 6 units. Questions clearly match AP Micro concepts and mirror the style/complexity of College Board FRQs. Demonstrates strong understanding of how each unit’s content is applied in an AP exam context.	Proficient Includes example FRQ questions for all 6 units. Most questions are accurate and relevant, but a few may be slightly simplified or missing AP-style depth.	Satisfactory Includes questions for most units. Some questions are inaccurate, irrelevant, or not in AP-style format. Shows basic understanding.	Developing Includes questions for some units. Many questions are inaccurate, vague, or unrelated to AP FRQ expectations. Shows limited understanding.	Does Not Meet Expectations Includes few or no example FRQ questions. Questions are mostly incorrect, irrelevant, or not in AP format, showing minimal understanding.
Organization	Exceeds Expectations Economic concepts are clear and concise. Project is well-organized, neat, and easy to follow. Clear headings and logical flow.	Proficient Economic concepts are clear and concise. Topics are mostly organized. Minor clarity or formatting issues.	Satisfactory Organization is uneven but content is understandable.	Developing Poor organization makes content difficult to follow.	Does Not Meet Expectations Disorganized and unclear.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric