- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Lab Report Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Lab Report Rubric Rubric for Lab Report At the school's Baazar, Tihirah noticed the burger vendor, Mr. Charles adding pineapple slices to the meat burger he served her. Mr. Charles explained that pineapples had a natural chemical in it which aids digestion of the meat making it softer. Tihirah wondered if this was true and wanted to do an experiment to test the information. Plan and Design an experiment to assist Tihirah to test this information. Rubric Code: Y235BCA By Aabidah Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Hypothesis 4 pts	Excellent Hypothesis is complete and accurate using complex construction method. Related to the Observation, Can be experimented on in the lab, Only one condition or variable is changed or manipulated.	Good Hypothesis is almost complete and accurate and is aligned to two of three criteria and uses complex construction.	Fair Hypothesis section is stated and aligned to one of three criteria and uses "IF THEN" method of construction	Poor Hypothesis section is stated but is not aligned to observation, experimental procedure or changes more than one variable or condition.	Very Poor Hypothesis is omitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Aim 4 pts	Excellent Related to the Hypothesis and stated as an aim with correct use of an action verb, linking a dependent and independent variable and related to the method.	Good Related to Hypothesis and is almost accurately stated.	Fair Related to Hypothesis and is partially accurately stated.	Poor Related to Hypothesis but not method and is not accurately stated as an aim with inaccurate use of verb, dependent or independent variable.	Very Poor Aim is omitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Apparatus and Materials 4 pts (3 points)	Excellent All apparatus and materials listed with quantities and sub-divided to show distinction between apparatus and materials.	Good Most apparatus and materials listed with most quantities	Fair Some apparatus and materials listed with some quantities given	Poor Few apparatus and materials listed with some quantities given	Very Poor Apparatus and Materials section is omitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Procedure 20 pts	Excellent Complete, logically written sequence listed in numbered chronological steps using instructional or command voice format and can easily be duplicated. Procedure states details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly states how to ensure one manipulated variable, how to measure the responding variable, formats to record data and to present results.	Good Mostly complete, logically written sequence listed in numbered chronological steps using instructional or command voice format and can easily be duplicated. Procedure mostly state details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly states either how to ensure one manipulated variable or how to measure the e responding variable.	Fair Somewhat complete, illogically written sequence listed in numbered steps using instructional or command voice format and is not easily duplicated. Procedure sometimes give details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, but does not state either how to ensure one manipulated variable or how to measure the e responding variable.	Poor Incomplete, illogically written sequence, difficult to follow listed in numbered steps using voice format other than instructional or command and is not easily duplicated. Procedure does not state details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly how to ensure one manipulated variable, how to measure the e responding variable.	Very Poor No procedure is stated.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Experimental Set Up 4 pts	Excellent All Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.	Good Most Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.	Fair Some Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.	Poor No Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.	Very Poor section is omitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Results 4 pts	Excellent All expected trends are stated, including accurately stating the trend related to the Aim and Procedure Draft table for recording data is drawn.	Good Trend related to the Aim and Procedure is accurately stated along with at least two other trends.	Fair Trend related to the Aim and Procedure is accurately stated alone	Poor Trend stated is inaccurate.	Very Poor No trend is stated.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Limitations, Precautions Possible Sources of Error 4 pts (4 points)	Excellent More than two Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.	Good Two Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.	Fair One Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.	Poor Either Limitation, Precaution or Sources of Error section is omitted and what is stated is not in numbered, listed format.	Very Poor All three sections are omitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Creativity, Presentation Visual Impact 4 pts	Excellent Creative and well organised, neatly presented and clearly marked subsections, very effective use of visuals and technology tools to present work	Good Well organised and neat using technology tools to present work	Fair Well organised but not neat	Poor Fairly presented, showing scant regard for the importance of layout or layout is unappealing with untidy work	Very Poor Carelessly presented, showing scant regard for the importance of layout or layout is unappealing
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Technical Requirements 4 pts	Excellent All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings rarely violated. Conventions for headings, subheadings rarely violated. Use 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri. Never use stylized fonts. Always use normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around). Always use double spacing. All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.	Good All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated few occasions. Conventions for headings, subheadings violated few occasions. few instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts. Always use normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around). Double spacing rarely violated. All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.	Fair All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated sometimes. Conventions for headings, subheadings violated sometimes. Some instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts. some instances normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around) not being used. Double spacing violated at times. All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.	Poor All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated regularly. Conventions for headings, subheadings violated regularly. instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts. regular instances normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around) not being used. Double spacing violated regularly. All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent is not adhered to.	Very Poor All rules violated throughout on numerous occasions.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Cover Page 4 pts (10 points)	Excellent All information is provided: Name of Student Class Subject Unit Topic Lab Number Page Number Date	Good Almost all information is provided. Includes 5-6 pieces of information	Fair Some information is provided. 3-4 pieces of information is included.	Poor Little information submitted. 1-2 pieces of information stated.	Very Poor No cover page is submitted.
Feature / Points
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Use of Academic English 4 pts	Excellent Strict adherence to conventions of academic English: -correct grammar -correct use of punctuation -Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.	Good Mostly adhered to conventions of academic English: -correct grammar -correct use of punctuation -Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.	Fair Some adherence to conventions of academic English: -correct grammar -correct use of punctuation -Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.	Poor Little adherence to conventions of academic English: -correct grammar -correct use of punctuation -Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.	Very Poor No adherence to conventions of academic English: -correct grammar -correct use of punctuation -Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.

Keywords:

science lab

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric