iRubric: Body Systems and Disease States Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Body Systems and Disease States Presentation

Copy of Disease Report Presentation

Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html

Rubric Code: Y22W78

By KevinDuguay

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Political Science

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Evaluation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Anatomy of the Disorder	Poor The group did not explain the anatomy of the disorder and what structures are involved.	Fair The group did a basic explanation of the anatomy that is affected by the disorder and structures involved.	Good The group provided a good explanation of the anatomy that is affected by the disorder and structures involved.	Excellent The group provided an excellent description of the anatomy affected by the disorder plus extra information.
Physiology of the Disorder	Poor The group did not explain the physiology of the disorder.	Fair The group had a basic explanation of the physiology of the disorder.	Good The group had a good explanation of the physiology of the disorder.	Excellent The group provided an excellent description of the physiology of the disorder plus extra information.
Physiological Progress of Disorder	Poor The group did not explain the physiological progress of the disorder.	Fair The group had a basic understanding of the physiological progress of the disorder.	Good The group had a good explanation of the physiological progress of the disorder.	Excellent The group provided an excellent description of the physiological progressof the disorder plus extra information.
Population Affected	Poor The group did not discuss the population affected by the disorder.	Fair The group provided some statistics on the population affected by the disorder.	Good The group provided relevant statistics on the population affected by the disorder.	Excellent The group provided excellent statistical analysis of the population affected by the disorder plus extra information.
Treatment and Prognosis	Poor The group did not discuss current medications, dosages and outcomes for their disorder.	Fair The group provided basic descriptions of current medications, dosages and outcomes for their disorder.	Good The group provided a good description of current medications, dosages and outcomes for their disorder.	Excellent The group provided an excellent description of current medications, dosages and outcomes for their disorder.
Prevention	Poor The group did not explain if or how this disorder could or could not be prevented.	Fair The group did a basic explanation if or how this disorder could or could not be prevented.	Good The group did a good explanation if or how this disorder could or could not be prevented.	Excellent The group did an excellent explanation if or how this disorder could or could not be prevented
Handout	Poor The group did not provide a simple, clear , concise handout to use as a study guide.	Fair The group just copied the presentation notes as the study guide for the students.	Good The group provided a good, clear, simple concise study guide for the students that was no more than two pages in length.	Excellent The group provided an excellent study guide for the students that was no more than 2 pages in length with key aspects of their presentation.
Individual Evaluation
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 6 pts	Excellent 8 pts
Organization	Poor Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.	Fair Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.	Good Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.	Excellent Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Graphics	Poor Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics	Fair Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.	Good Student's graphics relate to text and presentation.	Excellent Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.
Mechanics	Poor Student's presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors.	Fair Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Good Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Excellent Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Eye Contact	Poor Student reads all of report with no eye contact.	Fair Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report.	Good Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes.	Excellent Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes.
Speaking	Poor Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.	Fair Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.	Good Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.	Excellent Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Sources Cited	Poor No Works Cited page	Fair Most content only correctly cited	Good Some content and/ or pictures cited	Excellent All pictures and content cited
Content	Poor Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.	Fair Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Good Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.	Excellent Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.

Keywords:

Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric