iRubric: Disease Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Disease Research Project

This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your Disease Research Project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Technology project & presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your assignment have been represented and all other criteria have been met.

Rubric Code: XXB3A38

By j3texans

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 85 pts	Fair 70 pts	Poor 50 pts	UNACCEPTABLE 0 pts
Disease topic and required question 40 %	Excellent Disease topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. All 6 questions answered completely	Good Disease topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required. 4- 5 questions discussed	Fair Disease topic is slightly discussed with only 3 questions discussed	Poor Disease topic is minimally addressed, and few if any of the questions are addressed.(2 questions answered completely)	UNACCEPTABLE Disease topic discussed is not an Integumentary System Disease and/or less than 2 questions are discussed.
Technology Product used 15 %	Excellent Technology app is advanced. Text is easy to read. Colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. Additional applications are embedded within this product, including a post presentation quiz for audience	Good Technology selected is average. Text is easy to read. Black and white colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. Only One additional application is embedded within( post presentation quiz for audience)	Fair Technology selected is average. Text is easy to read. No additional application is embedded within.	Poor Technology selected is minimally different than Power Point. Little effort put into enhancing visual.	UNACCEPTABLE Google Slides/Power Point is used
Oral Presentation 10 %	Excellent The presentation was organized and smooth, Presenter was able to reasonably answer questions during the Q&A.	Good The presentation was adequate, Presenter was able to somewhat answer questions during the Q&A.	Fair The presentation was poorly presented, The Presenter was able to somewhat answer questions during the Q&A	Poor The presentation was poorly presented, the presenter was not able to answer questions during the Q&A.	UNACCEPTABLE No Oral Presentation or The presentation was inadequate, and the presenter was unable to answer any questions during the Q&A.
Grammar and Mechanics 10 %	Excellent There are no misspelled words within the product.	Good There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.	Fair There are less than 3 misspelled words within the product.	Poor There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.	UNACCEPTABLE More than 4 misspelled words, and multiple mechanical errors
Sources Cited 10 %	Excellent Sources used in project correctly cited for each graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Good Sources used in project correctly cited for most graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Fair Sources used in project correctly cited for some graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Poor Sources used in project Incorrectly cited for few graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	UNACCEPTABLE Information presented was all cut and pasted (graphics allowed)
Self Reflection 15 %	Excellent Rubric is completed clearly, including "What I could have improved upon"	Good	Fair Rubric is completed clearly, including minimal response to "What I could have improved upon"	Poor	UNACCEPTABLE Rubric is not completed and/or is missing , or no response to the question of "What I could have improved upon"

Keywords:

Disease Research Project Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric