iRubric: Comp Group Oral Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Comp Group Oral Presentation Rubric

Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation for a small group of students, on a a holistic assessment.

Rubric Code: WXCACW2

By paigetables

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Group Oral Presentation Evaluation
	Did a great job 20 pts	Presented well 16 pts	Satisfactory 12 pts	Needs to improve 8 pts
Individual Preparation 20 %	Did a great job The presenter used class time exceptionally well to prepare and worked fully during the time that was allotted in class. The presenter maintained eye contact with the audience, seldom returning to notes. Notes were well done.	Presented well The presenter generally used class time well, but could have done more in the time available. The presenter kept eye contact most of the time but frequently returned to notes. Notes may not have been well done.	Satisfactory The presenter needed to focus more in class and use time more efficiently. The presenter occasionally used eye contact, but still read most of the report, or, the notes were not very helpful.	Needs to improve The presenter did not use their time in class well and did not work fully in class when preparation time was assigned. The presenter read all of the report with no eye contact, or no notes at all were used.
Equality of Presentation 20 %	Did a great job The presenter was present for class preparation time and shared equally in preparation for the presentation. The presenter participated equally with other group members in delivering the presentation and in leading the discussion.	Presented well The presenter assisted noticeably more or less than the other presenters in preparing for the presentation. The presenter presented noticeably more or less than other group members in delivering the presentation and in leading the discussion.	Satisfactory The presenter may have been absent for one or more class preparation sessions. The presenter did not contribute as much to the preparation as the other members. The presenter only participated in part of the presentation or discussion.	Needs to improve The presenter was absent for the preparation time or did not contribute much to the preparation of the presentation. The presenter participated much less than the other presenters in delivering the presentation and in leading the discussion. Or, the presenter did not participate in the preparation or the presentation.
Elocution and Display of Material 20 % Pronunciation of words and sentences; clarity of speech; grammar; Clear, edited visuals	Did a great job The presenter used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members could hear. Grammar mistakes were rare. The visuals were easy to understand and see and had no grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Presented well The presenter's voice was clear and pronounced most words/phrases correctly. Most audience members could hear. Had some grammar mistakes. The visuals could be understood and seen and/or had some grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Satisfactory The presenter's voice was low and difficult to hear and/or words were incorrectly pronounced and/or grammar mistakes were noticeable. The visuals may have been somewhat unclear to understand and see and/or had noticeable grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Needs to improve The presenter mumbled, incorrectly pronounced words frequently or spoke too quietly. Or, grammar mistakes were frequent. The visuals did not support the presentation well and/or there were several grammar mistakes or misspellings in the visuals.
Subject Knowledge 20 %	Did a great job The presenter demonstrated full knowledge by explaining and answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.	Presented well The presenter was familiar with some of the answers to questions, or failed to explain fully.	Satisfactory The presenter was uncomfortable or unaware about the basic information and was only able to answer and explain basic information.	Needs to improve The presenter did not have good understanding of the information and couldn't answer questions about the subject.
Overall Effectiveness 20 %	Did a great job The presenter was very enthusiastic, kept the attention of the audience the whole time and the purpose of the presentation was achieved.	Presented well The presenter was somewhat enthusiastic and kept the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose was mainly achieved.	Satisfactory The presenter had little enthusiasm and struggled to keep the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose was somewhat achieved.	Needs to improve The presenter was not enthusiastic and/or the audience's attention showed disinterest. The purpose was not achieved.

Keywords:

Speaking Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric