iRubric: Group Process Video Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Process Video Assignment

Group

Criteria for successful group work practice.

Rubric Code: WXB8522

By Enedina01

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Process Video Assignment 100 %
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts
Beginning Phase of Group 20 pts	Poor Student present but no handouts presented and minimal education provided. No trust or safe environment created.	Fair Handouts ready but minimal education provided. Welcome was slightly attempted and did not establish trust or create a safe environment.	Good Handout appropriate and attempted to provide education on the focus of the lesson for the day. Some welcoming but attempts to establish a trusting and safe environment.	Excellent Excellent Preparation with appropriate handouts and demonstrated appropriate education of the focus on lesson for the day. Warm welcoming and establishes a trusting and safe enviornment.
Group Discussion 20 pts Engagement of group at mid-phase	Poor Student primarily silent and long pauses happen. Failed to engage most of the members and no evidence of frequent use of open-ended questions, interactions or bonding among members.	Fair Tries to initiate engagment, interaction and bonding following the handout and education provided. Attempts to redirect members but members lose focus of discussion topic. Group discussion is encouraged but struggled to have members fully engage. Quick and simple responses received from members.	Good Inititated engagement, interaction and bonding with use of handouts and education provided appropriately. Able to redirect members and re-focus on discussion topic in a professional manner. Back and forth engagement of members occurs and is lead by student at least at least 50% of the time	Excellent Discussion among members flow smoothly and mostly lead by the members. Student able to provide prompts leading to the discussion of the members. Able to redirect members and re-focus on discussion topic in a professional manner. Student able to provide excellent information from the handout(s) leading to open discussion of members.
Group Planning 20 pts Pre-planning group activities	Poor No Handout No technique or strategy No evidence of handout for dicussion questions No evaluation form	Fair Handout provided minimal information Technique/strategy was short and no practice among members was evident. Limited use of discussion questions and limited assessment of strengths or weaknesses from members. Evaluation form was very short and did not allow members to appropriately evaluate the student's practice.	Good Handout was appropriate Demonstrated technique/strategy was evidenced-based and members were provided opportunity to practice. Discussion questions were applied and made attempts to provide appropriate feedback and assess strengths and weaknesses from members. Evaluation form was provided to the members	Excellent Had 2 - 3 handouts appropriately prepared for members. Technique/strategy was evidenced-based and modeled appropriately. Allowed sufficient time for members to practice technique/strategy. Handout of discussion questions were open-ended, exploratory and able to gather data to assess strengths and weaknesses of members. Evaluation form provided members opportunity to provide feedback and comments for improvement or strengths of the student's facilitation skills
Teaching Phase 20 pts Modeled a technique or strategy for group members to improve or decrease symptoms	Poor Spoke about technique but did not model nor allow members to practice	Fair Attempted to teach technique but struggled to fully execute. Group members attempted to practice but appeared confused.	Good Technique was modeled once and members practiced the technique at least one time	Excellent Technique was modeled a couple of times to ensure group members understood how to practice the technique correctly. Group members practiced the technique and student provided feedback and correction to ensure the technique was executed well.
Closure 20 pts Summarizes and provides feedback as well as recieve feedback from group members	Poor Ended the group session with no summary or evidence of feedback	Fair Attempts made to end the group with limited summary and feedback.	Good Ends summarizing the session and provides some feedback and provides opportunity to receive feedback from some members.	Excellent Summarizes the session providing both strengths and weaknesses from the group session. Elicits feedback from most of the members and provides appropriate feedback.

Keywords:

group, treatment, discussion

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric