Skip to main content
iRubric: Drug and Deviance Reflection Paper Rubric

iRubric: Drug and Deviance Reflection Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Drug and Deviance Reflection Paper Rubric 
Reflection Paper Rubric
Using sociological perspectives, theories of deviance, and techniques of neutralization to provide insight to some facet of illicit drug use. You may reflect on an individual, a town, or the topic in general. You must, however, use specifics from material covered in class and classroom discussion.
Rubric Code: WXA2992
By kassini
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Reflection Paper for 387-H05-HR
Drugs and Deviance Response Paper
  not acceptable

1 pts

Fair/Passing quality

2.5 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Depth of reflection
20 %

not acceptable

Writing demonstrates lack of reflection on the selected topic, with no details.
Fair/Passing quality

Writing demonstrates a minimal reflection on the selected topic, including a few supporting details and examples.
Good

Writing demonstrates a general reflection on the selected topic, including some suporting details and examples.
Excellent

Writing demonstrates an in-depth reflection on the selected topic, including supporting details and examples.
Relation to class materials
20 %

not acceptable

Information has little to do with the material covered in class
Fair/Passing quality

Information somewhat relates to the material covered in class Few details and/or examples are given.
Good

Information clearly relates to the material covered in class. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples from class materials.
Excellent

Writing clearly relates to the material covered in class. It includes several supporting details and/or examples covered in class and shows additional insights gained from additional research
Terms and definitions
35 %

not acceptable

Sociological perspective is missing. Only one theory of deviance is explained but connection to material is vague or missing and techniques of neutralization connection is missing or unclear.
No additional sociological terms are included.
Fair/Passing quality

At least one sociological perspective is included. Only one theory of deviance is explained and connected to material and techniques of neutralization connection is missing or unclear.
Less than three additional sociological terms are included but are not used correctly.
Good

At least on sociological perspective is included. Two or more theories of deviance are explained but are not clearly connected to material or techniques of neutralization connection is not clear.
Less than three additional sociological terms are included but are used correctly.
Excellent

At least on sociological perspective is included. Two or more theories of deviance are explained and connected to material with references made to at least two techniques of neutralization.
At least three additional sociological terms are included correctly.
Structure & Organization
15 %

not acceptable

Writing unclear, disorganized. Thoughts make little to no sense. Insufficient length.
Fair/Passing quality

Writing is unclear, and thoughts are not well organized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner.
Sufficient length.
Good

Writing is mostly clear, concise, and organized with the use of excellent sentence/paragraph structure. Sufficiently long enough so that thoughts are expressed in a logical manner.
Excellent

Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with the use of excellent sentence/paragraph structure. Sufficiently long enough so that thoughts are expressed in a logical manner.
Grammar & spelling
10 %

not acceptable

There are numerous spelling or grammar errors per page of writing reflection.
Fair/Passing quality

There are no more than five spelling or grammar errors.
Good

There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors.
Excellent

There are no spelling or grammar errors.



Keywords:
  • sociology



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98