Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Genetics Final Project 2013 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Genetics Final Project 2013
Infectious Disease Final Project 2012
Rubric Code:
WB77A2
By
dslaughter
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Exam
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Genetics Project
WOW!!! Great Job!
4 pts
Meets Expectations
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Enter Title
0 pts
Intro/ConclusionTitle
X3
WOW!!! Great Job!
Well thought our introduction clearly states direction of paper, question posed and points to be supported. Conclusion includes restatement of basic ideas and personal discussion as to the significance of the points made.
Meets Expectations
Introduction clearly states direction of paper, question posed and points to be supported. Conclusion includes restatement of basic ideas and some personal input as to their significance.
Needs Improvement
Introduction states question to be studied and points to be supported. Conclusion includes restatement of basic ideas with no elaboration or discussion
Enter Title
Introduction and conclusion lack focus and do not serve to frame the reader's efforts or establish the significance of the paper.
Discussion/Explanation 1
X5
WOW!!! Great Job!
One aspect of the topic is clearly defined, well researched, supported with data, and presented with interest and elaboration
Meets Expectations
One aspect of the topic is defined, fairly well researched and supported. Presented with explanation with or without elaboration
Needs Improvement
One aspect of the topic is explained and backed up by research, but lacks elaboration or clear explanation.
Enter Title
No slides or 1 or two slides of little use to
presentation.
Discussion/Explanation 2
X5
WOW!!! Great Job!
One aspect of the topic is clearly defined, well researched, supported with data, and presented with interest and elaboration
Meets Expectations
One aspect of the topic is defined, fairly well researched and supported. Presented with explanation with or without elaboration
Needs Improvement
One aspect of the topic is explained and backed up by research, but lacks elaboration or clear explanation.
Enter Title
Member clearly does not have any knowledge of subject matter
Discussion/Explanation 3
X5
WOW!!! Great Job!
One aspect of the topic is clearly defined, well researched, supported with data, and presented with interest and elaboration
Meets Expectations
One aspect of the topic is defined, fairly well researched and supported. Presented with explanation with or without elaboration
Needs Improvement
One aspect of the topic is explained and backed up by research, but lacks elaboration or clear explanation.
Enter Title
One aspect of the topic is discussed but lacks support from research and explanation is limited or lacking.
Thoughtful analysis
X3
WOW!!! Great Job!
Provides elaborate evidence of researched content and an excellent understanding of the subject. Student has made an excellent effort to present a considered opinion or conclusion based on class experience.
Meets Expectations
Provides evidence of researched content and a good understanding of the subject. Student has made some effort to present a considered opinion or conclusion that may or may not be based on class experience.
Needs Improvement
Provides some evidence of researched content and understanding of the subject. Student has made little effort to present a onsidered opinion or conclusion based on class experience.
Enter Title
member did research without collaboration as isolated add on to project
Organization:written
X3
WOW!!! Great Job!
Member includes a clear explanation of and how a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease.
Meets Expectations
Member includes a reference to a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease but may not provide a thorough explanation of the technology or how it was applied.
Needs Improvement
Member does not reference to a specific technology has been used to study his/her aspect of the disease or the reference is poorly explained.
Enter Title
no technology reference
References
X1
WOW!!! Great Job!
EXCELLENT!!!<BR>
A complete list of references used including in text citations (numbers are OK) in proper MLA format.
Meets Expectations
Good!<BR>
A complete list of references used including in text citations in MLA format. May have format errors.
Needs Improvement
Fair<BR>
A list of references is included with in text citations . May have some format errors -
Enter Title
Unacceptable<BR>
A list of references used without in text citations or only web addresses provided
Subjects:
Biology
Science
(General)
Types:
Exam
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.