iRubric: WRSP 635 Capstone Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

WRSP 635 Capstone Project

WRSP 201 Theology of Worship

Theology Capstone Project

Rubric Code: T68A53

By jkinchen

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Graduate

Theology & Philosophy of Worship Position Paper
	Excellent 200 pts	Average 160 pts	Poor 120 pts	Unacceptable 80 pts
Theological Elements 20 %	Excellent The student provided well articulated Theological points and based on OT, NT and Historical concepts.	Average The student provided points which emphasized Theology, but only had general support of OT, NT and Historical concepts.	Poor The student provided points which were loosely Theological although they attempted some support of OT, NT and Historical concepts.	Unacceptable The student provided points which were not Theological.
Explanation of Points 20 %	Excellent Content is thorough, accurate, persuasive and relates to the points. Explanations are specific, stated clearly, and are well supported. Concepts are focused with clear and succinct writing	Average Content relates to the majority of points. Explanations are stated and supported for the majority of points. Clear and focused explanation for some of the theological points.	Poor Content is not comprehensive and connection of explanations is not obvious for majority of points. Explanations for the points are addressed, but not well supported. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.	Unacceptable Content is incomplete. Explanations are not clear and do not directly relate with the Theological points.
Scripture References 20 % Tied to Theological Elements	Excellent The student provided Scripture references that directly relate to all of the Theological Points.	Average The student provided Scripture references that directly relate to the majority of the Theological Points.	Poor The student provided Scripture references that directly relate to less than half of the Theological Points.	Unacceptable The student provided Scripture references that directly relate to very fewer of the Theological Points.
Description of worship service 15 %	Excellent The student provided a comprehensive description of a typical worship service. Included "normal" contents and sequence of weekly worship: song lyric, drama, scripture as script, and prayer.	Average The student provided a general description of a typical worship service. Included "normal" contents and sequence of weekly worship: song lyric, drama, scripture as script, and prayer.	Poor The student provided a general description of a typical worship service. Included little description of the "normal" contents and sequence of weekly worship: song lyric, drama, scripture as script, and prayer.	Unacceptable The student provided an outline type description of a typical worship service. Included very little description of the "normal" contents and sequence of weekly worship: song lyric, drama, scripture as script, and prayer.
Discussion 15 %	Excellent Discussion fully addresses the questions: 1) What are the theological strengths of the services? 2) How might these services be improved to make sure they measure up to the high theological standard for an evangelical church?	Average Discussion somewhat addresses the questions: 1) What are the theological strengths of the services? 2) How might these services be improved to make sure they measure up to the high theological standard for an evangelical church?	Poor Little of the discussion addresses the questions: 1) What are the theological strengths of the services? 2) How might these services be improved to make sure they measure up to the high theological standard for an evangelical church?	Unacceptable None of the discussion addresses the questions: 1) What are the theological strengths of the services? 2) How might these services be improved to make sure they measure up to the high theological standard for an evangelical church?
Format 10 % Turabian elements	Excellent Paper correctly follows the required format, including citations and documentation with no errors and/or No grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors	Average Paper follows the required format, including citations and documentation with some errors and/or 4 or less grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors	Poor Paper follows the required format, with few citations and documentation and with more significant errors and/or 5-10 grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors	Unacceptable Paper is not presented in the required format, with few citations and documentation and/or 11 or more grammatical, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling errors

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric