iRubric: Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Project rubric

Students will be given a location that is in a seismically active zone (volcanoes or earthquakes or both). Students will choose either the seismic risk or the eruption risk and detail what would happen should the nearest volcano erupt or a 7.5 earthquake occurred (human and evirnomental effect: short and long term. Explanation of why these effects occurred including the tectonic processes must be included. A short description of the location should also be included (population, climate, industry etc.). Presentation format to be determined by student but must incorporate all of the necessary elements in an easily understandable format.

Rubric Code: S43B7C

By coolbreeze

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Project
	Exceeds 10 pts	Good 7 pts	Fair 4 pts	Poor 2 pts
Content	Exceeds The project includes all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion and includes effective use of sources.	Good Project includes all relevant information; however, it does not utilize the resources and/or is not well-organized.	Fair Does not have all of the relevant information of the poster. Sources and information are not used in an effective manner, or there is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion	Poor The project is lacking in elements required and in resources used. There are many gaps in information presented.
Work quality/effort	Exceeds The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the learner is proud of his/her work. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner.	Good The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this project.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Style/Mechanics	Exceeds The project has an element of creativity and style,, and is not just a list of facts. The project is presented in a clear and concise manner with full understanding of the subject.	Good The project is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Good clear presentation.	Fair The project lacks style and reads more like a list of facts than an oral group presentation. The project lacks neatness and clarity	Poor The project lacks a clear understanding of the subject matter and their are many errors. Project is not creative.