Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Beavers in Beavertown. Yes? Or No? rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Beavers in Beavertown. Yes? Or No?
Fish Kill Town Meeting
Students will research beavers' effect on the environment and present information to the class in the form of an interest group at a town meeting.
Rubric Code:
S3B9C6
By
smilliken
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Biology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Beaver Town Meeting
Fair
2 pts
Good
4 pts
Great
6 pts
Score
(N/A)
Group Facts
Fair
Students presented facts that are mainly appropriate to their special interest group and based on the data. Facts were sometimes based upon actual facts, not personal attacks or sensationalism.
Good
Students presented facts that are mainly appropriate to their special interest group and based on the data. Facts were based upon actual facts, not personal attacks or sensationalism.
Great
Students presented well thought-out arguments appropriate to their special interest group and based on the data. Arguments were based on facts, not personal attacks or sensationalism.
Score
Reflection paragraph
Fair
Students reflection did not contain any reference to valuable information learned.
Good
Students reflection contained information from lesson, but was not applied.
Great
Students applied knowledge gained in the unit as they interpreted data and presented arguments. Answers to questions reflected appropriate application of information.
Score
Visual Aids
Fair
Students' poster was incomplete, or inaccurate.
Good
Student's group poster had basic information, but could have included more.
Great
Students' group poster accurately represented their group's views and interests. Their poster was colorful and neatly done.
Score
Group Involvement
Fair
Most team members contributed to the presentation, but not necessarially equally.
Good
All team members contributed to the presentation, but not always equally.
Great
All team members contributed to the presentation equally.
Score
Presentation
Fair
Students somewhat effectively adopted their roles and sometimes presented information appropriate to their special interest group.
Good
Students were mainly effective in adopting their roles and presenting information appropriate to their special interest group. .
Great
Students effectively adopted their roles and presented information appropriate to their special interest group.
Score
Keywords:
Beaver group project
Subjects:
Biology
Chemistry
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.