Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Entreprenuership Midterm paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Entreprenuership Midterm paper
Case Paper #1--Media law
Rubric Code:
RXCB787
By
jdovel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Paper #1
Below average
6 pts
Average
7 pts
Above average
8.5 pts
Superior
10 pts
Introduction
Below average
No thesis statement. Purpose of paper not explained.
Average
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Above average
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Somewhat explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Superior
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Clearly explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement and makes strong final statement.
Content
Below average
--Responses unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for case study insufficient.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Average
--Responses too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or poor for case study.
--Support for responses barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Above average
--Responses somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or questionable for case study.
--Support for responses sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Superior
--Responses interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper and appropriate for case study.
--Support for responses complex, complete, and in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Comprehension
Below average
--did not apply learned knowledge to case
--did not make connections between cases and law
Average
--minimally applied knowledge to case
--made some connections between cases and law
Above average
--above average application of knowledge to case
--made good connections between cases and law
Superior
--superior application of knowledge to case
--superior connections between cases and law
Grammar and Style
Below average
-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Average
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Above average
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Superior
--Consistent and appropriate voice, use of third person.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Format/research
Below average
--no outside research
--did not follow format
Average
--minimal outside research
--somewhat followed format
Above average
--some outside research
--followed format with one error
Superior
--outside research that added to argument
--followed format
Conclusion / Summary
Below average
Summary is either missing, incomprehensible, or contains numerous errors.
Average
Several issues with summary.
Above average
1-2 issues with summary.
Superior
The Summary describes what was said/concluded and provides the reader with main conclusions.
Adotoping difficulty / Social innov
Below average
Innovation adoption and or social innovation are not adequately covered.
Average
Several issues with difficulty of innovation adoption and social innovation.
Above average
1-2 issues with difficulty of innovation adoption and social innovation.
Superior
The paper uses the concepts in the Gunfire at Sea paper to explain why the organization may have problems or is good at innovation adoption. Does the organization promote social innovation to include a description of the profitability of the social innovation?
Globalization and Sustainability
Below average
Globalization and sustainability were either not covered or were not coherently covered.
Average
Several issues with globalization and sustainability
Above average
1-2 issues with globalization and sustainability
Superior
The paper uses the concepts in the The World is Flat Video to explain why the organization may have problems with or uses globalization to its advantage. Does the organization promote sustainable innovation to include a description of the long term success associated with sustainability?
Creativity, innovation sources
Below average
Creativity and innovation sources are either not covered or were not coherently covered.
Average
Several issues with creativity and organizational sources
Above average
1-2 issues with creativity and organizational sources
Superior
The paper uses the concepts in the text chapter 5 and the Christensen video to explain how the organization may have problems with or uses creativity to its advantage. What sources does the organization use for innovation?
Search strategies for innovation
Below average
Search strategies for innovation were not covered or were not coherently covered
Average
Several issues with search strategies for innovation
Above average
1-2 issues with search strategies for innovation
Superior
The paper uses the concepts in the text chapter 7 to explain how the organization may have problems with or uses creativity to its advantage.
Keywords:
Case Study Research
Subjects:
Business
Communication
English
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.