Skip to main content
iRubric: Entreprenuership Midterm paper rubric

iRubric: Entreprenuership Midterm paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Entreprenuership Midterm paper 
Rubric Code: RXCB787
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case Paper #1
  Below average

6 pts

Average

7 pts

Above average

8.5 pts

Superior

10 pts

Introduction

Below average

No thesis statement. Purpose of paper not explained.
Average

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Above average

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Somewhat explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Superior

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Clearly explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement and makes strong final statement.
Content

Below average

--Responses unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for case study insufficient.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Average

--Responses too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or poor for case study.
--Support for responses barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Above average

--Responses somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or questionable for case study.
--Support for responses sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Superior

--Responses interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper and appropriate for case study.
--Support for responses complex, complete, and in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Comprehension

Below average

--did not apply learned knowledge to case
--did not make connections between cases and law
Average

--minimally applied knowledge to case
--made some connections between cases and law
Above average

--above average application of knowledge to case
--made good connections between cases and law
Superior

--superior application of knowledge to case
--superior connections between cases and law
Grammar and Style

Below average

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Average

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Above average

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Superior

--Consistent and appropriate voice, use of third person.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Format/research

Below average

--no outside research
--did not follow format
Average

--minimal outside research
--somewhat followed format
Above average

--some outside research
--followed format with one error
Superior

--outside research that added to argument
--followed format
Conclusion / Summary

Below average

Summary is either missing, incomprehensible, or contains numerous errors.
Average

Several issues with summary.
Above average

1-2 issues with summary.
Superior

The Summary describes what was said/concluded and provides the reader with main conclusions.
Adotoping difficulty / Social innov

Below average

Innovation adoption and or social innovation are not adequately covered.
Average

Several issues with difficulty of innovation adoption and social innovation.
Above average

1-2 issues with difficulty of innovation adoption and social innovation.
Superior

The paper uses the concepts in the Gunfire at Sea paper to explain why the organization may have problems or is good at innovation adoption. Does the organization promote social innovation to include a description of the profitability of the social innovation?
Globalization and Sustainability

Below average

Globalization and sustainability were either not covered or were not coherently covered.
Average

Several issues with globalization and sustainability
Above average

1-2 issues with globalization and sustainability
Superior

The paper uses the concepts in the The World is Flat Video to explain why the organization may have problems with or uses globalization to its advantage. Does the organization promote sustainable innovation to include a description of the long term success associated with sustainability?
Creativity, innovation sources

Below average

Creativity and innovation sources are either not covered or were not coherently covered.
Average

Several issues with creativity and organizational sources
Above average

1-2 issues with creativity and organizational sources
Superior

The paper uses the concepts in the text chapter 5 and the Christensen video to explain how the organization may have problems with or uses creativity to its advantage. What sources does the organization use for innovation?
Search strategies for innovation

Below average

Search strategies for innovation were not covered or were not coherently covered
Average

Several issues with search strategies for innovation
Above average

1-2 issues with search strategies for innovation
Superior

The paper uses the concepts in the text chapter 7 to explain how the organization may have problems with or uses creativity to its advantage.



Keywords:
  • Case Study Research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16