iRubric: Israel Glogster Research Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Israel Glogster Research Presentation

Forensics Team Activity

Students will create a Glogster teaching about a specific area in Israel.

Rubric Code: R78434

By stefwiss

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Research Glogster
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts
Graphics	Excellent Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, are of high quality and greatly enhance reader interest or understanding.	Good Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.	Fair Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the Glog, and are of decent quality.	Needs Improvement Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the viewer.
Content - main idea	Excellent The Glog has a well-stated, clear purpose and theme that is carried out throughout the Glog.	Good The Glog has a clearly stated purpose and theme, but has one or two elements that are unrelated to it.	Fair The purpose and theme of the Glog is somewhat muddy or vague.	Needs Improvement The Glog lacks a purpose and theme.
Content - research	Excellent The glog includes all required research, the facts are all accurate.	Good The glog includes most required research, facts are almost all accurate.	Fair The glog is missing some required research, OR some of the facts are inaccurate.	Needs Improvement The glog reflects little research, OR many of the facts are inaccurate.
Layout/colors	Excellent Layout and colors add to the content, and reflect a unified style.	Good Layout and colors do not detract from the content and reflect a good attempt at a unified style.	Fair Layout and colors somewhat detract from the content OR no unified style is apparent.	Needs Improvement Layout and colors make the content hard to read or otherwise distract the reader.
Grammar and Mechanics	Excellent Capitalization and punctuation are correct throughout the glog. There are no grammatical errors. There are no spelling errors.	Good Glog contains 1-5 grammar or spelling errors.	Fair Glog contains 6-10 grammar or spelling errors.	Needs Improvement Glog contains more than 11 grammar or spelling errors.
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the work was shared equally among the group members. Students stayed on task.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others. Students stayed mostly on task.	Fair The group communicated relatively well and only needed a little teacher intervention. Some students dominated the work and others did not participate much. Students were on task a little of the time.	Needs Improvement The group did not work well together. There were miscommunications and/or disagreements among the group members. Students were mostly off task.
Presentation	Excellent Presenters were all very confident in delivery and did an excellent job of engaging the class. Speakers presented in a loud, clear voice and maintained mostly constant eye contact. The presentation was shared equally among all members of the group.	Good Presenters were occasionally confident with their presentation however the presentation was not as engaging as it could have been. Speakers presented in a loud, clear voice but turned to the screen too often and lost eye contact. Some member of the group participated slightly more than others.	Fair Presenters were not consistent with the level of confidence they showed the class but had some strong moments. Speakers presented in a voice that is sometimes clear but constantly turned to the screen and maintained very little eye contact. Some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.	Needs Improvement Presenters were not confident and demonstrated little evidence of planning prior to presentation. Speakers did not present in a loud or clear voice and simply read from the presentation. The group displayed a lack of cooperation skills.

Keywords:

Glogster

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric