iRubric: Media/Technology Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Media/Technology Presentation

Create a Media/Technology Presentation on a theme of your choice thinking on authentic scenarios and materials (Refer to Herrell and Jordan: Realia, Strategy #13 and Section VI). Themes vary as to grade level or subject and can elicit new vocabulary, language structure, questioning. Select age/grade level, describe the rationale for the theme, and how it will help to promote and develop proficiency in English or a second language. IMPORTANT: You are not allowed to use Power Point for this presentation. You could use Web 2.0 tools, Prezi, Glogster, SmartBoard, a movie software, etc.

Rubric Code: Q97B26

By runae12

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Media/Technology Presentation
	Exceeds 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts
Content	Exceeds The project includes all relevant information to the theme (age/grade level, rationale, and how it will help to promote and develop proficiency in English or a second language) in a well organized fashion. Sections are all connected.	Good The media project includes all relevant information. However, it is somewhat organized.	Fair Does not have relevant information on the theme. There is not enough information presented. Information is disorganized.	Poor The media project is lacking elements required. There are many gaps in information presented.
Work quality/effort/style	Exceeds The work done demonstrates that the learner is proud of his/her work. Effort exceeds expectation.The project has an element of creativity and style, and is not just a list of facts. Project is presented in a clear and concise manner demonstrating full understanding of the theme.	Good The work was done with good effort. Time put into this project is appropriate.The project is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Good clear presentation.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the future teacher is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.The project lacks style and reads more like a list of facts than a practical theme. Lacks neatness and clarity.	Poor Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the future teacher is capable of. Work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.The project lacks a clear understanding of the theme and their are many errors. Project is not creative.
Research and technology tool	Exceeds The project demonstrates a level of understanding that exceeds the expectation of this assignment. Adequate use of technology tool (not Power Point).	Good The student provides a clear presentation of the information. This is in their own words. Adequate use of technology tool (not Power Point).	Fair There are several confusing moments and the information presented is not completely shared during the presentation. Hesitant use of technology tool (not Power Point).	Poor The information that is presented lacks many elements of what is expected. Technology tool chosen does not convey the theme correctly.
Citation of sources	Exceeds Sources of research have been correctly cited.	Good Sources of research have been adequately cited.	Fair Citation of sources is limited.	Poor Sources have not been cited.
Discussion Board/Sharing	Exceeds Complete project posted on Blackboard Discussion Board.	Good Most sections of the project were posted on Blackboard Discussion Board.	Fair Incomplete project posted on Blackboard Discussion Board.	Poor 0= Project was not posted on Discussion Board.

Keywords:

Multi media representation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric