iRubric: Immunity Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Immunity Project

This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your Immunity Project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Technology project & presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your assignment have been represented and all other criteria have been met.

Rubric Code: PX9A86A

By j3texans

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)	Missing (N/A)
Immunity Content 20 %	Excellent Immunity topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner.	Good Immunity topic is somewhat discussed but more information is required.	Fair Immunity topic is slightly discussed	Poor Immunity topic is minimally addressed, and few if any of the questions are addressed.	Missing Immunity topic discussed is not an immunity issue
Required Questions 20 %	Excellent All 6 questions answered,	Good 5 questions discussed	Fair 4 questions discussed.	Poor 2-3 questions discussed.	Missing Only 1 question discussed
Teamwork 15 %	Excellent Student was engaged in the project, and completed more than their required role.	Good Student was engaged in the project, and completed their role.	Fair Student was slightly engaged in the project, and minimally completed their required role.	Poor Student did less than what was expected of them, and was distracted.	Missing Student was not engaged, and did not complete their required role.
Oral Presentation 15 %	Excellent The presentation was organized and smooth, Each member took an equal part in the presentation, and Members were able to reasonably answer questions during the Q&A.	Good The presentation was adequate, Each member took an equal part in the presentation, and Members were able to somewhat answer questions during the Q&A.	Fair The presentation was poorly presented, Each member took part in the presentation, and Members were able to somewhat answer questions during the Q&A	Poor The presentation was poorly presented, Each member took part in the presentation, and Members were not able to answer questions during the Q&A.	Missing The presentation was inadequately presented, few member took part in the presentation, and Members were unable to answer any questions during the Q&A.
Technology Product used 20 %	Excellent Technology app is advanced. Text is easy to read. Colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. Additional applications are embedded within this product, including a post presentation quiz for audience	Good Technology selected is average. Text is easy to read. Black and white colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. Only One additional application is embedded within( post presentation quiz for audience)	Fair Technology selected is average. Text is easy to read. No additional application is embedded within.	Poor Technology selected is minimally different than Power Point. Little effort put into enhancing visual.	Missing Google Slides/Power Point is used
Grammar and Mechanics 10 %	Excellent There are no misspelled words within the product.	Good There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.	Fair There are less than 3 misspelled words within the product.	Poor There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.	Missing More than 4 misspelled words

Keywords:

Immunity Project Rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric