iRubric: Informative Group/Individual Presentation on Night topics rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Informative Group/Individual Presentation on Night topics

Information researched and presented by these students will enlighten all of us on important aspects of Elie Wiesel's memoire of the holocaust, Night.

Rubric Code: PX6CAC3

By MarcellaLewis

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Informative Presentation:
	Poor 2 pts (N/A)	Fair 3 pts (N/A)	Good 4 pts (N/A)	Excellent 5 pts (N/A)
Quality of Project 30 pts Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully informed audience about the topic. Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or visual.	Poor Project was not organized. Information presented was not clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the fact sheet. There were no activities, diagrams, or visuals for the class.	Fair Project was fairly organized. Information presented was clear. Project did not fully answer all the questions asked on the fact sheet. There were no activities, diagrams, or visuals for the class.	Good Project was extremely well organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project did answer all the questions asked on the fact sheet, if briefly. Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or visual.	Excellent Project was extremely well organized, interesting, and easy to follow. Project fully and clearly informed audience about the topic and showed advanced critical thinking on that topic. All factual questions given were fully answered. Students were given one of the following: activity, diagram, or visual.
Oral Presentation 30 pts Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to see/read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by teacher and other students.	Poor Presentation was not clearly audible and was hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to see/read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the instructor.	Fair Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by instructor or other students.	Good Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read.Group members were able to answer most questions posed by instructor and other students.	Excellent Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the instructor.
Group work - Written report 15 pts Group stayed on task the entire class time allotted for the project. Group was organized and able to complete project with no assistance from the instructor.	Poor Did not use time wisely when working together as a group. Group did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting from instructor.	Fair Needs improvement on how to use time wisely when working together in a group.Group basically stayed on task, but was not fully focused on project. Instructor may have had to speak to the group to keep them on task or problem solve/conflict resolution.	Good Used time wisely when working together in group. Group was focused on task. Asked questions when needed.	Excellent Group stayed on task the entire class time allotted for the project. Group was organized and able to complete project with no assistance from the instructor.
Preparedness 15 pts Students do not read from their slides or paper and show knowledge of the subject area.	Poor Students do not seem prepared to present.	Fair Students seem to be pretty prepared but have not practiced flow.	Good Students are prepared but lack of coordination between members is somewhat distracting.	Excellent Students show that they are completely prepared and that they have rehearsed before the presentation. Speaker content flows logically between all parties.
Professionalism on delivery 10 pts Student displays confidence, competence, and ownership in their presentation.	Poor Little or no eye contact. Body language and posture poor. Format for presentation and/or written report aren't cohesive. Grammatical, language and format errors. Team outward appearance sloppy/unkempt.	Fair Students make some eye contact, but entire room is not fully engaged, with most attention straying to the instructor. Written report standards meet minumum standards. Students are neatly groomed.	Good Students make some eye contact, but distract by their self-consciousness or silliness. Class is engaged, but not for content. Written report is adequate. Students are in neatly in uniform.	Excellent Students stand up straight, look confident, speak clearly and make eye contact during the entire presentation. Students engages entire audience through-out presentation. Cohesiveness between presentation materials and written report demonstrate advanced application of learning. Students are well groomed, in business attire or a team uniform.
Time Limit 0 pts 1 point is subtracted for every minute under 2 minutes and over the 3 minute time limit.	Poor Too short. (under 2 minutes)	Fair Too long. (over 3 minutes)	Good Hit time limit, but just by chance. Not well practiced.	Excellent Easily and comfortably within time frame. (2-3 minutes)
Total 100 pts 100 points	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent

Keywords:

Elie Wiesel's Night informative presentations

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric