Skip to main content
iRubric: Renewable Resources Trade Show Presentation rubric

iRubric: Renewable Resources Trade Show Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Renewable Resources Trade Show Presentation 
This project is worth a total of 100 points Students will work in groups of four to research one renewable energy source. They will role play as a company attempting to pitch their energy source at a trade show. They will be responsible for being knowledgeable on facts and figures on their energy source, as well as creating communication materials to further their presentation. Presentation will be based on peer group reviews.
Rubric Code: P695BX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Research - 40 Points Poss
  Outstanding

40 pts

Good

37 pts

Fair

33 pts

Poor

29 pts

Unacceptable

23 pts

Research information

1)Where does the energy source originate? 2)How is it turned into usable energy? 3)What are three advantages and three disadvantages of using this source? 6)How does it affect the earth and our lives?

Outstanding

Group researched selected topic and answered all four focus questions. Information is relevant, detailed, and summarized in their own words. Writing guidelines were followed and the project was turned in on time. 40-38 pts
Good

Student researched selected topic and answered 3 or 4 of the focus questions. Most information is relevant, detailed, and summarized in their own words. Most of the writing guidelines were followed and the paper was turned in on time. 37-34 pts
Fair

Student researched topic, but did not clearly answer all the questions and/or some information was plagiarized. Information is scattered, vague, unorganized, and/or missing. Many of the writing guidelines were ignored and/or the paper was turned in late. 33-29 pts
Poor

Student did minimal research. Less than half of the questions were answered clearly and/or much of it was plagiarized. Information is scattered, vague, unorganized, and/or missing. Many of the writing guidelines were not followed and/or the paper was turned in late. 29-24 pts
Unacceptable

Student did little or no research. Many of the focus questions were not answered and/or were partially answered and/or plagiarized. Writing guidelines were not followed and/or the paper was late or not turned in at all.
23-0 points
Comm. Materials- 30 Points Possible
  Outstanding

30 pts

Good

26 pts

Fair

22 pts

Poor

18 pts

Unacceptable

14 pts

Content

Outstanding

The poster and brochure supports all six of the major research questions and is presented on time and in an organized fashion. 20-19 points
Good

The poster supports only 5 of the 6 major research questions or is presented on time and in a somewhat organized fashion. 18-17 pts
Fair

The poster supports only 4 or 5 of the major research questions and/or is presented in rather unorganized fashion and/or was turned in late. 16-15pts
Poor

The poster supports only half of the major research questions and/or is presented in an unorganized way and/or was turned in late. 14-13 points
Unacceptable

The poster supports less than half of the major research questions and is presented in an unorganized way and/or the work presented is plagiarized and/or not turned in. 12-0 points
Graphics

Outstanding

One or more graphs showing pertinent information is included. Each graph is neat and and easily understood.
5 points
Good

At least one graph showing pertinent information is included. Each graph is somewhat neat and/or somewhat easily understood. 4 pts
Fair

At least one graph showing somewhat pertinent information is included. One or more of the graphs is only somewhat neat and/or is confusing. 3 points
Poor

A graph is either not included or shows non-pertinent information. Any graphs shown are sloppy and/or confusing. 2 points
Unacceptable

A graph is not included.
1-0 points
Attractiveness

Outstanding

The poster has an element of creativity and is not just a list of facts. It is neatly done and pleasing to the eye. It shows obvious pride in the work. 5 pts
Good

The poster has an element of creativity and is not just a list of facts. It is neatly done and somewhat pleasing to the eye. It shows some pride in the work. 4 pts
Fair

The poster shows some creativity and/or is mainly a list of facts, that may contain errors. It is rather sloppily put together, showing little pride in the work. 3 pts
Poor

The poster shows no creativity and/or is just a list of facts, that contain errors. It is very sloppily put together, showing no pride in the work. 2 pts
Unacceptable

The poster shows no creativity and is just a list of facts, that contain errors. It is either sloppily put together, showing no pride in the work, or is non-existent. 1-0 pts
Presentation - 30 Points Possible
  Exceeds

15 pts

Good

13 pts

Fair

11 pts

Poor

9 pts

Unacceptable

7 pts

Trade Show Presentation

Exceeds

The presentation shows a clear understanding of the material presented. Students speak clearly and effectively, showing obvious signs of preparation. 15-14pts
Good

The presentation shows an understanding of the material presented. Students speak somewhat clearly and effectively, showing signs of preparation.
13-12 points
Fair

The presentation shows some understanding of the material presented. Student speaks somewhat clearly and/or effectively, showing some signs of preparation. 11-10 pts
Poor

The presentation shows little understanding of the material presented. Student does not speak very clearly and/or effectively, showing very little signs of preparation. 9-8 points
Unacceptable

The presentation shows no understanding of the material presented. Student does not speak clearly or effectively, showing no sign of preparation, or does not present at all. 7-0pts
Participation - 10 Points Possible
  Exceeds

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

4 pts

Unacceptable

2 pts

On task/Participation

Exceeds

Student was on task, working diligently every day during class-time, and worked well with team members. 9-10 points
Good

Student was on task, working somewhat diligently most every day during class-time, and worked well with team members. 7-8 pts
Fair

Student was on task at least half of the time, but did not work very diligently and/or very well with team members during class-time and/or was absent a day or two during this project. 5-6 pts
Poor

Student was on task less than half of the class-time, not working diligently and/or very well with team members and/or was absent more than two days during this project. 3-4 points
Unacceptable

Student was off task most of the time and/or was absent for more than half of the project. Team members could not count on this student for help. 0-2 pts



Keywords:
  • advantages, disadvantages, energy, natural resources, by-product, pro/con argument, renewable/non-renewable,







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16