iRubric: Comp Oral Presentation Preparation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Comp Oral Presentation Preparation Rubric

ESL Oral Presentation Preparation Rubric

Evaluates the key components of the preparation time for a class presentation on a a holistic assessment.

Rubric Code: NXCAB8C

By paigetables

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Preparation
	Did a great job: Level 4 4 pts	Well done: Level 3 3 pts	Satisfactory Level 2 2 pts	Needs to improve: Level 1 1 pts
Effectiveness of Preparation Time 25 %	Did a great job: The presenter used class time exceptionally well to prepare and worked fully during the time that was allotted in class.	Well done: The presenter generally used class time well, but could have done more in the time available.	Satisfactory The presenter needed to focus more in class and use time more efficiently.	Needs to improve: The presenter did not use their time in class well and did not work fully in class when preparation time was assigned.
Group Equity in Preparation 25 %	Did a great job: Each of the presenters who was present shared equally in preparation for the presentation. Everyone who was present contributed.	Well done: One or more of the presenters who were present for preparation did more work than the other(s).	Satisfactory One or more presenters did not contribute as much to preparation as the other(s) did.	Needs to improve: The presenter was absent for the preparation time or did not contribute much to the preparation of the presentation.
Content 25 % Presentation, PSA, Discussion	Did a great job: The presenters communicated detailed, researched information in their presentation. The PSA was clear and specific and communicated a clear message. The discussion was helpful for students.	Well done: The presenters communicated researched information, but the presentation was not as clear as it could have been. The PSA could have been better focused. The discussion could have been more helpful.	Satisfactory The presenters needed more research to support their claims. The PSA was lacking an effective focus. The discussion needed to be better planned.	Needs to improve: The presenter did not present research to support the claims. The PSA did not have a clear focus or details. The discussion was not relevant or helpful.
Visuals 25 % PowerPoints, handouts	Did a great job: The visuals were easy to understand and see and had no grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Well done: The visuals could be understood and seen and/or had few grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Satisfactory The visuals were somewhat unclear to understand and see and/or had some grammar mistakes or misspellings.	Needs to improve: The visuals did not support the presentation well and/or were difficult to see and/or there were several grammar mistakes or misspellings.

Keywords:

Preparation for Speaking Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric