- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Classical Music Comparison Chart rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Classical Music Comparison Chart Pre and Post-WWI Comparison Chart A comparison of the 4 main types of Classical Instrumental music forms Rubric Code: NXA7578 By Scrapsomusic Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Comparison Chart
	4 (N/A)	3 (N/A)	2 (N/A)	1 (N/A)
Chart Requirements 4 pts A comparison of the Classical symphony, string quartet, concerto, and sonata, focusing on instrumentation, structure, and common compositional techniques.	4 The chart includes all required elements of the project and includes a clear, strong comparison. Goes beyond what was expected.	3 The chart meets most of the required elements and includes a good comparison.	2 The chart includes some of the required elements. There is not enough information presented.	1 The chart is lacking in elements required and in resources used. There are many gaps in the information presented.
Work quality/effort 4 pts	4 The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that all student used multiple sources to contribute to the project.	3 The work was done with good effort that shows what the student is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this presentation, using several sources.	2 Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed, and only one or two sources used.	1 Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete. Only the textbook was used as a source.
Visual Presentation 2 pts	4 The chart has an element of creativity and style. It is well labeled and presented in a clear and concise manner.	3 The chart is well labeled, and is presented in a clear and concise manner.	2 The chart is presented in a satisfactory manner. Not all parts are clear.	1 The chart lacks a clear presentation and there are several errors.