iRubric: Lion King v. Hamlet rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Lion King v. Hamlet

Compare/Contrast essay scoring rubric.

Rubric Code: NX3XA29

By kccaro

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12

Lion King v. Hamlet
	SBP Substantially Below Proficient (N/A)	PP Partially Proficient (N/A)	P Proficient (N/A)	PWD Proficient with Distinction (N/A)
Introduction/Thesis Statement Introductory paragraphs	SBP Introduction and thesis statement do not introduce both subjects for comparison or contrast.	PP Introduction and thesis statement introduce the subjects for comparison or contrast, but don't give accurate and complete information	P Introduction and thesis statement create interest and are fairly well developed. They cover both subjects but not engaging.	PWD Well developed introduction and thesis statement. They engage the reader and cover both subjects and the author's purpose.
Conclusion Conclusion paragrah	SBP There is no conclusion evident in the essay, or the conclusion is not related to the essay.	PP The concluding paragraph makes a point about the subjects for comparison or contrast, but it does not unify or "wrap-up" the essay effectively.	P The concluding paragraph unifies the essay around the subjects and the point used for comparison or contrast, but it is not very engaging or interesting.	PWD The concluding paragraph unifies the essay around the subjects and the point used for comparison or contrast. It paraphrases the thesis statement and is engaging.
Graphic Organizer Pre-writing sheet and graphic organizer	SBP Student's graphic organizer was incomplete and no pre-writing was turned in.	PP Student's graphic organizer was only partly filled out with missing information in some areas. There was more than 2 blank questions	P Student's graphic organizer was completely filled out and all the questions on the pre-writing sheet was complete.	PWD Student's graphic organizer was complete and detailed. Pre-writing was detailed and answered every question beyond literal meaning.
Support--Similarities Character, plot and setting	SBP Provides little if any support for each similarity.	PP Provides some support for each similarity. Some information is slightly inaccurate. Has at least one solid similarity.	P Provides good support for each similarity. Most information is accurate. Has at least two solid similarities.	PWD Provides well-developed support for each similarity. The information is accurate. Has at least three solid similarities.
Support--Differences Character, plot, setting	SBP Provides little if any support for each difference.	PP Provides some support for each similarity. Some information is slightly inaccurate. Has at least one solid difference.	P Provides good support for each similarity. Most information is accurate. Has at least two solid differences.	PWD Provides well-developed support for each similarity. The information is accurate. Has at least three solid differences.
Mechanics- Spelling, grammar	SBP Contains sufficient errors in grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling that make the paper difficult to read.	PP Contains many errors in grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling that interfere with the intended meaning.	P Contains several errors in grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling that do not interfere with the intended meaning.	PWD Contains few, if any, errors in grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling.

Keywords:

Compare/Contrast essay, rubric

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric