- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Small Group Project: Case 9.1 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Small Group Project: Case 9.1 Case Study Rubric will be used to guide the implementation of project and to evaluate the outcomes (products, presentation, mock-decision making) of project. Rubric Code: N2XA445 By LMH056 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: Graduate

Case Study 9.1
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts
Constructionism v. Constructivism	Poor Compare and contrast the theories of learning (No examples are presented).	Fair Compare and contrast the theories of learning (at least ONE example is presented).	Good Compare and contrast the theories of learning (at least TWO examples are presented).
Identification of Leadership Structure	Poor Leadership structure is not identified; Group members are not assigned roles; No role structure is presented in the project proposal.	Fair Leadership structure is identified; Group members are assigned unclear roles; Role structure is vague in the project proposal.	Good Leadership structure is clearly identified; Group members are assigned specific roles; Role structure is outlined in the project proposal.
Presentation of Case Study Project	Poor Project goals and objectives are not identified; Project activities do not meet project objectives; documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is not presented.	Fair Project goals and objectives are identified; Project activities meet some of the project objectives; Partial documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is presented.	Good Project goals and objectives are clearly identified; Project activities meet all of project objectives; Documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is presented.
Mock-Decision Making	Poor Mock-decision making models are not used in the project.	Fair Mock-decision making models are used in the project (at least TWO models are implemented).	Good Mock-decision making strategies are used in the project (all THREE models are implemented).
Overall Presentation	Poor Presentation was not specific to decision-making models; Group members did not work together to meet project goals and objectives; Products were not presented to inform or show creativity.	Fair Presentation was specific to some of the decision-making models; Group members worked together to meet some of the project goals and objectives; Products were presented to inform but did not show creativity.	Good Presentation was specific to all of the decision-making models; Group members worked together to meet all of the project goals and objectives; Products were presented to inform and were able to show creativity.