Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Critique essay two rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Critique essay two
CRITIQUE WITH COMPARE-CONTRAST SECTION
Comparison of two articles and fact checking
Rubric Code:
MXCW442
By
sabrynac77
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critique essay
Poor
1 pts
Below average
2 pts
Average
3 pts
Above average
4 pts
Superior
5 pts
Introduction
Poor
No introduction.
Below average
An attempt at an introduction has been made but it does not follow conventional paragraph format.
Average
Introduction includes some of the purpose of the essay, but stronger one needed
Above average
The students has communicated the overall purpose of the article in a topic sentence and well-structured paragraph.
Superior
The student has clearly identified the overall purpose of the article in a well-conceived topic sentence, and provided an overview of what is to follow.
Purpose & Evidence
Poor
The student compares or contrasts, but does not include both. There is no supporting information or support is incomplete.
Below average
The student compares and contrasts items, but supporting information is incomplete. The student may include information that is not relevant to the comparison.
Average
The student compares and contrasts items, but with minimal supporting information
Above average
The student compares and contrasts items clearly, and provides supporting information but it is general. The student includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
Superior
The student compares and contrasts items clearly and fully. The student points to specific examples to illustrate the comparison, and includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
Organization/Structure
Poor
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized. No conclusion.
Below average
The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but some information is in the wrong section. Some details are not in a logical or expected order, which distracts the reader, and/or no conclusion.
Average
The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but some information is in illogical place
Above average
The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but does not follow a consistent order when discussing the comparison and/or a strong conclusion may be lacking.
Superior
The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, and follows a consistent order when discussing the comparison. Strong conclusion.
Research
Poor
No sources or research included.
Below average
Student included almost no sources
Average
Student included 3 sources; some research did not apply
Above average
Student included 4 or more outside sources to support thesis
Superior
Student included 5 or more relevant sources and explained importance of sources in relation to topic.
Grammar
Poor
Writer makes more than 6 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Below average
Writer makes 4 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Average
Writer makes 3 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Above average
Writer makes 1-2 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Superior
Writer makes no errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Format
Poor
Student did not follow format
Below average
Student followed format minimally
Average
Student followed format some of the time
Above average
Student followed format with one or two mistakes
Superior
Student followed format, no mistakes
Keywords:
Critique, Article, College Essay
Subjects:
Computers
English
Journalism
Education
Types:
Project
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.