- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Banned Book Report rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Banned Book Report Banned Book Video This rubric will assess the use of research to support a position on the practice of banning books, using a specific banned or challenged book as the guiding example. Rubric Code: MX9C876 By Hurst5 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Banned Book Report
	Good 60 pts	Fair 40 pts	Poor 20 pts
Research	Good Student used more than two journal articles from the approved databases and more than one legitimate website to format support of the position/thesis.	Fair Student used two journal articles from the approved databases and one legitimate website to format support of the position/thesis. Student could have provided more support by using more sources.	Poor Student used fewer than two journal articles from the approved databases and one website, which had questionable legitimacy. Research was uneven or inadequate.
Citation	Good Student followed the proper MLA format for each source used in the video. Student included the Works Cited in the video and placed a copy in the Banned Book folder in GoogleDocs.	Fair Student attempted to follow the proper MLA format for each source used in the video. Student included the Works Cited in the video and placed a copy in the Banned Book folder in GoogleDocs.	Poor Student made numerous errors with MLA formatting for sources in the video, or failed to include a citation for every source used. Student did not include the Works Cited in the video and/or did not place a copy in the Banned Book folder in GoogleDocs.
Report	Good Student organized the research in a logical order and created a report that illustrated the student's position in an engaging and informative manner.	Fair Student organized the research in a somewhat logical order and wrote a report that attempted to illustrate the student's position in an engaging and informative manner.	Poor Student's research had no logical order. The report was poorly written and executed. The report was not engaging or informative.