Skip to main content
iRubric: Spanish Speaking Country Presentation rubric

iRubric: Spanish Speaking Country Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spanish Speaking Country Presentation 
Poster and presentation rubric
Rubric Code: M5C3W7
By RLMasters
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Project/Presentation
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

2 pts

Preparedness for Presentation

This includes arranging to have the projector, etc. brought in.
Excellent

Professional behavior is displayed by having activities and classroom set-up in advance.
Good

Professional behavior was displayed by having activities and classroom set-up on time.
Fair

Professional behavior was displayed for the most part because activities and classroom were being set-up shortly after the due date.
Poor

There was a lack of professional behavior displayed by having activities prepared for students upon entering the classroom significantly late.
Visuals

Can be a poster, power point, artifact, food, etc.
Excellent

The visual includes all information on the topic in an organized fashion.
OR
The visual is appropriate for the topic
Good

Visual includes all relevant information; however,is not well-organized.
OR
The visual is appropriate for the topic
Fair

Does not have all of the relevant information of the visual. There is not enough information presented.
OR
The visual is somewhat appropriate for the topic
Poor

Does not have all of the relevant information of the visual. There is not enough information presented. Information is presented in an unorganized fashion
OR
The visual is not appropriate for the topic
Work effort

Excellent

The work was done well to the best of the students ability. It is evident that alot of time was put into this project.
Good

The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this project.
Fair

Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.
Poor

The work is done with poor effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.
Style/Mechanics

Excellent

The project has creativity and , and is not just a list of facts. The project is presented in a clear and concise manner with full understanding of the subject.
Good

The project is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Good clear presentation.
Fair

The project lacks style and reads more like a list of facts. The project lacks neatness and clarity.
Poor

The poster has limited style and reads like a list of facts. The poster lacks neatness and clarity.
Presentation

Excellent

The student presents the information clearly and displays a complete understanding of their information. It is evident that the student was well prepared.
Good

The student presents the information fairly clearly and displays a reasonable understanding of their information.
Fair

The information presented is not clear and only has a basic understanding of the content.
Poor

The information presented is not clear and only has a limited understanding of the content.
Written report

Excellent

The report is typed clrealy with no grammar or speling mistakes.
All references are legitimate (ex: not wikipedia) and are cited correctly.
Hard copy of references are turned in at the time of the presentation along with the report.
Good

The report is typed clrealy with very few grammar or speling mistakes.
Most references are legitimate (ex: not wikipedia) and are cited correctly.
Hard copy of references are turned in at the time of the presentation along with the report.
Fair

The report is typed clrealy with a few grammar or speling mistakes.
Some references are legitimate (ex: not wikipedia) and are cited correctly.
Hard copy of references is late as is the report.
Poor

The report is not typed clrealy, it contains several grammar or speling mistakes.
References are not legitimate (ex: not wikipedia) and are cited correctly.
Hard copy of references are missing






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98