Skip to main content
iRubric: Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution rubric

iRubric: Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution 
Leadership & Professionalism in Event Execution
This rubric defines the leadership and professionalism of undergraduate students working in teams to plan an event.
Rubric Code: L98C43
By cambrianteacher
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Daily Performance
  Poor

1 pts

Acceptable

2 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Exceptional

4 pts


(N/A)

Attendance/Participation
Attendance

Poor

Student did not attend the event.
Student did not attend the majority of the team meetings for the event.
Acceptable

Student missed 70% of the team meetings for the event.
Satisfactory

Student attended 80% of the meetings for the event.
Exceptional

Student attended and was on time.
N/A
Participation

Poor

Student did not participate in activities. Did not listen to others or pay attention to team leaders.
Acceptable

Student participated in activities 70% (or slightly less) of the time with some prompting. Rarely listened to others or paid attention to team leaders.
Satisfactory

Student participated in activities in discussions in 80% of the time with minimal prompting. Usually listened to others and pays attention to team leaders.
Exceptional

Student consistently participated in activities and discussions without prompting. Listened to others and paid attention to team leaders.
N/A
Participation Dynamics
Attitude

Poor

Student consistently demonstrated a negative and disrespectful attitude toward peers and team leaders. Usually had a negative attitude about group tasks.
Acceptable

Student struggles to demonstrate a positve and respectful attitude towards peers and team leaders. Often has a negative attitude about group tasks.
Satisfactory

Student usually demonstrated a positive and respectful attitude towards peers and team leaders. Often has a positive attitude about group tasks.
Exceptional

Student consistenly demonstrated a positive and respectful attitude toward peers and team leaders. Almost always has a positive attitude about group tasks.
N/A
Working with Others

Poor

Student rarely listened to, shared with, or supported others. Student was often disruptive to peers in the group.
Acceptable

Student sometimes listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was sometimes disruptive to peers in the group.
Satisfactory

Student usually listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was occasionally disruptive to peers in the group.
Exceptional

Student almost always listened to, shared with, and supported others. Student was rarely disruptive to peers in the group.
N/A
Focus

Poor

Student rarely focused on the group discussion or task. Required constant redirection to stay on task.
Acceptable

Student focused intermittently on the group discussion or task. Required frequent redirection to stay on task.
Satisfactory

Student usually maintained focus on the group discussion or task. Required occasional redirection to stay on task.
Exceptional

Student consistently stayed focused on the group discussion and task. Required minimal redirection to stay on task.
N/A
Effort

Poor

Processing/work reflected no effort from this student.
Acceptable

Processing/work reflected little effort from this student.
Satisfactory

Processing/work reflected some effort from this student.
Exceptional

Processing/work reflected a strong effort from this student.
N/A
Integration of Learning

Poor

Student did not demonstrate understanding or utilize positive leadership tools or skills within the group setting. May have utilized leadership tools or skills negatively.
Acceptable

Student demonstrated limited understanding and rarely utilized positive leadership tools and skills within the group setting.
Satisfactory

Student demonstrated some understanding and generally utilized positive leadership tools and skills within the group setting.
Exceptional

Student demonstrated thorough understanding and routinely utilized positive leadership tools and skills within the group setting.
N/A
Leadership/Professionalism
Group Rules

Poor

Regularly disobeyed group rules, regardless of prompting/redirection.
Acceptable

Required frequent prompting/redirection to follow group rules.
Satisfactory

Required occasional prompting/redirection to follow group rules.
Exceptional

Usually followed group rules.
N/A
Independent & Collaborative Work

Poor

Does not complete tasks.
Overly relies on others.
Asks repetitive questions.
Poor teamwork skills.
Acceptable

Depends on others for occassional assistance.
Asks clarification questions.
Cooperates in groups most of the time.
Satisfactory

Follows directions, uses time productively and completes work in a timely manner.
Shares ideas. Accepts the ideas of others. Does an appropriate share of a group's work.
Exceptional

Takes initiative and is self motivaated.
Completes tasks without prompting.
Is highly cooperative and displays leadership in team situations.
N/A
Respect & Responsibility

Poor

Inappropriate behavior most of the time.
Needs frequent reminders to respect other's ideas and vendor's property.
Acceptable

Appropriate behavior demonstrated most of the time.
Satisfactory

Appropriate behavior in the event setting. Respects other's ideas and vendors' property.
Exceptional

Positive role model.
Exemplary actions.
N/A
Professionalism

Poor

Was not approachable, dedicated, flexible or patient in the event planning and orchestrration process.
Did not honor "dress code".
Acceptable

70% of the time maintained conduct and "dress code" during the event planning and orchestration.
Satisfactory

80% of the time maintained conduct and "dress code" during the event planning and orchestration.
Exceptional

Maintained conduct and "dress code" appearance during event planning and orchestration, by being approachable, dedicated, flexible, and patient.
N/A
Ethics

Poor

Does not take responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions.
Does not exhibit fairness and transparency.
Acceptable

70% of the time takes responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions.
Exhibits fairness and transparency.
Satisfactory

80% of the time takes responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions.
Exhibits fairness and transparency.
Exceptional

Takes responsibility for obligations, actions and decisions.
Exhibits fairness and transparency.
N/A
Time Management Skills

Poor

Does not prioritize goals, set SMART objectives, create action plans and demonstrate project management skills.
Acceptable

70% of the time prioritizes goals, sets SMART objectives, creates action plans and demonstrates project management skills.
Satisfactory

80% of the time prioritizes goals, sets SMART objectives, creates action plans and demonstrates project management skills.
Exceptional

Prioritizes goals, sets SMART objectives, creates action plans and demonstrates project management skills.
N/A



Keywords:
  • Leadership, Professionalism, Event Planning



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98