iRubric: Workshop Wikispace Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Workshop Wikispace Rubric

Rubric to evaluate participant wikis that covers critical thinking and collaboration using multimedia. A great wiki will be very user-friendly, simple in design, and educational to anyone! All group members must edit and contribute to the site. Each website must make the presenter a member.

Rubric Code: KXW6697

By mountnrat

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Wiki Rubric
	Poor 3 pts	Developing 6 pts	Average 8 pts	Outstanding 10 pts
Purpose & Theme Clarity Purpose: the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists.<BR> <BR> Theme: the subject of a talk, a piece of writing, a person's thoughts, or an exhibition; a topic	Poor The site lacks a purpose and theme.	Developing The purpose and theme of the site is muddy or vague. OR The purpose/theme are grade-related.	Average The site has a clearly stated purpose and theme. The purpose/theme seems to be well though-out.	Outstanding The site has a thorough and clear purpose and theme that are both extremely well-written. The purpose/theme are original and creative.
Purpose & Theme Throughout Website Is it easy to tell that the purpose is the building block of the site?<BR> <BR> Does the site stick to the stated theme?	Poor The site is completely lacking in continuity. Very few linked sites that do not relate to the theme/purpose.	Developing The site has a few pages that stick to the theme, but for the most part is incongruous. Linked sites are not chosen well and do not relate to the theme/purpose.	Average Almost all pages stick to the site's main purpose and themes, most pages are easily related to others. Linked sites are chosen well but do not all relate to the theme/purpose.	Outstanding All pages follow the site's main purpose and theme, all pages are easily related to others and are congruous. Linked sites are chosen well and relate to the main theme/purpose.
Fonts/Text Your site should be easy to read, but not have distracting text changes! Your text should support the video/pictures you use in the Wiki.	Poor A wide variety of fonts, styles, colors and point sizes is used. This detracts from the site, making it confusing for the viewer.	Developing The fonts are somewhat consistent between pages, headings, and paragraphs. The site has too many inconsistent changes in font color, style or point sizes.	Average The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size, color or style vary appropriately for headings and text.	Outstanding The fonts are consistent, easy to read and point size and color vary appropriately for pages, headings and text. Related content is evident because of text color/size/style changes. Use of font styles (italic, bold, underline) is consistent and improves readability.
Content What you choose to include in your site about the use of collaboration in critical thinking development. <BR> <BR> Do your research: don't include things in the site just because they're flashy!	Poor There are more than 4 inaccuracies in the content, and/or the content is unrelated to theme.	Developing 2-3 pieces of the information provided on the website is inaccurate. Some of the content is related to the theme of the site.	Average 0-1 bits of information on the website are inaccurate. The content is all related to the site's theme.	Outstanding All information on the website is 100% accurate. All content is related to the theme of the site. Content is also interrelated with itself!
Content Navigation Activities and links are well planned and thought out. It makes sense to an outsider how they should go through the pages.	Poor Group members have one activity page. This activity make sense in how it supports the development of critical thinking through collaboration using multimedia to demonstrate the activity.	Developing Group members have one activity page.	Average Group members have one logical page dedicated to the activity. It makes sense in how the activity support the principles of multimedia and collaborative learning.	Outstanding Group members have one logical page dedicated to the activity. It makes sense in how the activity support the principles of multimedia and collaborative learning. Authors have included a "content navigation" page or something that directs the user through the activities using embedded multimedia (screener).
Activity Whatever you want your reader to do, make sure it's connected to the content and educational!	Poor The chosen activity is not modified to suit audience. Activity is difficult/impossible for audience to complete or understand.	Developing The chosen activity is not modified to suit audience. Activity is difficult for audience to complete.	Average The chosen activity is modified to suit audience. Activity is simple for audience to complete.	Outstanding The chosen activity is original or drastically modified from an original source to be fairly unique. Modifications are appropriate and well-executed. The activity is simple and fun/interesting for audience to complete.
Collaboration Depending on how you choose to create the site, you may all work on pages together or you may delegate different responsibilities to different group members.	Poor Students had difficulty working with one or more group members. Communication between group members was nonexistent. Pages do not flow well together because not all group members could agree on decisions.	Developing Students had difficulty working with one or more group members. Some pages flow well together, but group members could not agree on some decisions.	Average Student works well with other group members. Most issues/problems were settled peacefully. All but 1-2 pages flow well together, group members could agree on all major decisions.	Outstanding Student works very well with other group members. Many of the group members looked to him/her for help, and the student readily gave assistance. Any issues/problems that arose were settled peacefully. All pages flow well together, group members could agree on all decisions, major or minor.
Citations At times, it is nearly impossible to create 100% original content. That's okay, as long as you are giving credit where credit is due!	Poor Most images, information and videos are not cited anywhere on the website.	Developing Some images, information and videos are cited on the website, but it is difficult to find the citations.	Average All images, information and videos are cited on the website. This is done simply, and on one page.	Outstanding All images, information and videos are cited on the website. This is done in correct APA format, and on one easily-linked page.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric