iRubric: ESL Oral Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

ESL Oral Presentation Rubric

Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation for ESL students, on a a holistic assessment.

Rubric Code: KX246WC

By Martina_Durisov

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Oral Presentation Evaluation
	Needs to improve: Level 1 1 pts	Satisfactory Level 2 2 pts	Presented well: Level 3 3 pts	Did a great job: Level 4 4 pts
Content/Information 20 %	Needs to improve: The presenter did not answer the questions asked in the task.	Satisfactory The presenter answered a few of the questions asked in the task, but did not include an intro or highlighted phrases.	Presented well: The presenter answered most of the questions asked in the task, but either did not include the intro or the highlighted phrases.	Did a great job: The presenter discussed all the questions asked in the task, including the intro and the highlighted phrases.
Speaking 20 % Pronunciation, clarity.	Needs to improve: The presenter used unclear sentence structures, pronunciation and/or language. The presenter was unclear.	Satisfactory The presenter used somewhat appropriate pronunciation and clarity.	Presented well: The presenter used appropriate sentence structures, pronunciation and clarity.	Did a great job: The presenter used appropriate sentence structures, pronunciation and the delivery was clear and easy to follow.
Language 20 % Grammar and vocabulary.	Needs to improve: The grammar and vocabulary was confusing and this detracted from the presentation. Complete sentences were rarely used.	Satisfactory The presenter used grammar, vocabulary, and phrases that mostly supported the topic. Complete sentences were sometimes used.	Presented well: The presenters used grammar, vocabulary, and phrases that mostly supported the topic. Complete sentences were mostly used.	Did a great job: The presenter used grammar, vocabulary, and phrases that supported the topic. Complete sentences were always used.
Overall Effectiveness 20 % summary	Needs to improve: The presenter was not enthusiastic and/or the audience's attention showed disinterest. The purpose for the presentation was not achieved.	Satisfactory The presenter had little enthusiasm and struggled to keep the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose of the presentation was somewhat achieved.	Presented well: The presenter was somewhat enthusiastic and kept the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose of the presentation was mainly achieved.	Did a great job: The was very enthusiastic, kept the attention of the audience the whole time and the purpose of the presentation was achieved.
Time Limit/Group Equity 20 %	Needs to improve: One presenter spoke far less than the other and/or presented for only one minute.	Satisfactory One presenter spoke somewhat more than the other and/or the presentation was less than two minutes.	Presented well: The presenters spoke equal amounts of time, but the presentation lasted less than two minutes (or vice versa).	Did a great job: Both presenters spoke equal amounts of time, and the presentation was between two and three minutes long.

Keywords:

Speaking Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric