iRubric: EDUC 1325 Group Project rubric

Maintains high energy level and audience is actively involved in the presentation. Questions asked or class discussion during the discussion

Fairly high energy level and some audience involvement.

Moderate energy, moderate audience involvement.

Hard to follow due to lack of energy or enthusiasm.

Depth of content reflects knowledge and understanding of core values and group goals. Main points adequately substantiated with timely, relevant and sufficient support.
Thoughtful presentation reflected through choice of topic and supporting evidence.

Provided accurate explanation of goals and core values.Provides some support for main points, but needed to elaborate further with explanations, examples, descriptions, etc. Support is relevant, but could be stronger.
Good presentation reflected through choice of topic and content.

Provides very minor amounts of content and little support for core value and group goals. Explanations of concepts are a bit weak or incomplete. Listeners gain minimal knowledge from presentation.
Topic seems somewhat relevant to audience, but not explicitly stated. Vague reference to audience needs and/or interests.
Considering interests of audience didn't seem paramount in topic and or/content.

Provides irrelevant or no support. Explanations of core value and group goals are inaccurate or incomplete. Listeners gain little knowledge form presentation. No attempt made to connect topic to targeted audience.

Consistently and effectively used eye contact to establish rapport with audience. Inconspicuous use of speaker notes and effective use of scanning to established an expanded zone of interaction.

Speakers looked up occasionally and focused on just a few people during the speech. Some use of speaker notes. Seemed a bit disengaged from audience for short periods of time.

Conspicuous use of speaker notes. Seems disengaged from audience for noticeable periods of time.

Speakers seldom looked at the audience. Read information from notes. Avoided eye contact with audience. Only occasional and sporadic glances.

Movements were purposeful and enhanced the delivery of the speech. Space was used well (front and center).

Speakers had adequate and non-distracting movement during the speech. Decent use of speaking space (front of room)

Speakers had some distracting movement during delivery. Space wasn't used to the advantage of the speaker (stayed in one place the whole time)

Movements were distracting (pacing or monotonous). Use of space was not considered by the speaker (potted plant)

kept within required time frame

5 minutes too long or too short of required time

10 minutes too long or too short of required time frame

15 minutes too long or too short of required time frame.