Skip to main content
iRubric: WEBSERACH Rubric

iRubric: WEBSERACH Rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
WEBSERACH Rubric 
Explore and apply the tools and strategies needed to conduct effective Web research. Research, Identify, Review and Select 6 web sites covering topics on assigned readings, case study, or essay.
Rubric Code: K2298X7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate, Post Graduate


Powered by iRubric WebResearch Rubric
This rubric is designed to evaluate a student's reflection on webResearch Rubric
  Excellent

The writer completely covers all required information.

6 pts

Good

The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article.

5 pts

Fair

The assigned category needs work.

3 pts

Poor

A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer.

1 pts

Summary

A brief summary of the article is included, identifying the author(s) key points. Author explains how the article relates to his or her main topic.

Excellent

A brief summary of the article is given with all the required information.<BR>
<BR>
The author(s) key points are clearly identified and well developed.
Good

A summary of the article is provided, but is lacking in one area.<BR>
<BR>
The author(s) key points are clearly identified but not well developed.
Fair

A summary of the article is attempted, but is severly lacking in more than one area.<BR>
<BR>
The author(s) key points are poorly identified.
Poor

No summary is given.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
The author(s) key points are not identified.
Required websites

Research, Identify, Review and Select 6 web sites that cover topics in your assigned readings, case study,

Excellent

The writer researched, identified, reviewed and selected 5-6 web sites that cover topics in your assigned readings, case study, or essay
Good

The writer researched, identified, reviewed and selected 3-4 web sites that cover topics in your assigned readings, case study, or essay
Fair

The writer researched, identified, reviewed and selected 1-2 web sites that cover topics in your assigned readings, case study, or essay
Poor

The writer researched, identified, reviewed and selected 0 web sites that cover topics in your assigned readings, case study, or essay
Data

Data supported findings. Be sure to cite your resources and provide the references using APA format. Remember to reference all work cited or quoted by the text authors.

Excellent

Data is relevant and supportive of conclusions.
Good

Data is relevant but lacks coherent connection to article findings.
Fair

Data is vague and unclear.
Poor

A copy of the article is not attached.
Essay Contents

Essay must include 4 several paragraphs on each site selected and outline the features, advantages and benefits of the cite including browsing experiences.

Excellent

Essay included 4 several paragraphs on each site selected and outline the features, advantages and benefits of the cite including browsing experiences
Good

Essay included 3 several paragraphs on each site selected and outline the features, advantages and benefits of the cite including browsing experiences
Fair

Essay included 2 several paragraphs on each site selected and outline the features, advantages without expanded notes on browsing experiences
Poor

Essay included 1 paragraphs on each site selected and outline the features, advantages without expanded notes on browsing experiences
Paper Format & Requirements

Paper must contain a table of your sites and provide the following column information: Site address (hyperlink please), description of site (i.e., Directory, portal, data, research, links, current articles, or other characteristics), use or application of site (best for research on legal regulation, great of securing data and tabulated trends, offers good current events articles, etc.), and your rating (1= bad –to 10 excellent).

Excellent

Paper contained a table of sites and provide the following column information:
Site address (hyperlink ), Description of site (i.e., Directory, portal, data, research, links, current articles, or other characteristics),
use or application of site (best for research on legal regulation, great of securing data and tabulated trends, offers good current events articles, etc.), and rating (1= bad –to 10 excellent).
Good

Paper contained a table of sites and provide 3-4 out 4 of the following column information:
1. Site address (hyperlink ),
2. Description of site (i.e., Directory, portal, data, research, links, current articles, or other characteristics),
3.use or application of site (best for research on legal regulation, great of securing data and tabulated trends, offers good current events articles, etc.), and
4. rating (1= bad –to 10 excellent).
Fair

Paper contained a table of sites and provide 2-3 out 4 of the following column information:
1. Site address (hyperlink ),
2. Description of site (i.e., Directory, portal, data, research, links, current articles, or other characteristics),
3.use or application of site (best for research on legal regulation, great of securing data and tabulated trends, offers good current events articles, etc.), and
4. rating (1= bad –to 10 excellent).
Poor

Paper contained a table of sites and provide 1-2 out 4 of the following column information:
1. Site address (hyperlink ),
2. Description of site (i.e., Directory, portal, data, research, links, current articles, or other characteristics),
3.use or application of site (best for research on legal regulation, great of securing data and tabulated trends, offers good current events articles, etc.), and
4. rating (1= bad –to 10 excellent).
Current article

The article is current (published within the last 5 years) and comes from a relevant journal.

Excellent

The article is both current and from a relevant journal.
Good

Relevant but not current
Fair

The article is not current.
Poor

The article is neither current nor from a relevant journal.
Citation

The reference citation follows proper guidelines.

Excellent

No errors exist in the citation.
Good

The reference citation has one error.
Fair

The reference citation has more than one error as it is written.
Poor

No attempt is made at referencing the article.
Grammar, spelling, capit., punct.

Good grammar and spelling are used throughout the summary.

Excellent

No errors exist in grammar or spelling, capitalization or punctuation.
Good

There are some spelling and grammar errors throughout the summary.
Fair

There are numerous grammar and spelling errors throughout the summary.
Poor

The writer's use of grammar is very poor and/or there are numerous spelling errors throughout the summary.



Keywords:
  • Web research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2021 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n109