iRubric: Career Development Folder rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Career Development Folder

This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your Career Development Folder. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Career Development Folder, to ensure that all intended elements of your assignment have been represented and all other criteria have been met.

Rubric Code: JXA6B73

By j3texans

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grading Rubric
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 85 pts	Fair 70 pts	Poor 50 pts	UNACCEPTABLE 0 pts
cover page 5 %	Excellent Cover Page has all 5 requirements	Good N/A	Fair N/A	Poor N/A	UNACCEPTABLE Does not contain all required elements or none provided
Resume 15 %	Excellent All and only important résumé parts are included. Contains E portfolio link  Order of résumé parts fit the applicant's assets and position.  No spelling, grammar, or word usage errors.	Good Most important résumé parts are included. Contains E portfolio link  Order of résumé parts fit the applicant's assets and position.  less than 2 spelling, grammar, or word usage errors.	Fair some important résumé parts are included. Contains E portfolio link  Order of résumé parts fit the applicant's assets and position.  less than 4 spelling, grammar, or word usage errors.	Poor Few important résumé parts are included. Contains e portfolio  Order of résumé parts fit the applicant's assets and position. more than 5spelling, grammar, or word usage errors.	UNACCEPTABLE No resume/e portfolio included
Content 25 %	Excellent Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include all 9 items of required information.	Good Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 8 items of required information	Fair Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed. A minimum of 7 items of required information	Poor Topic is mentioned, a minimum of 6 items of required information were provided.	UNACCEPTABLE Less than 6 items of required information is given.
Letter to Professional Organization 10 %	Excellent  Ideas were expressed in a clear and organized fashion.  Letter typed, clean, and is easy to read with no distracting error corrections.	Good  Ideas were mostly expressed in a clear and organized fashion.  Letter typed, clean, and is easy to read with no distracting error corrections.	Fair  Ideas were somewhat expressed in a clear and organized fashion.  Letter typed, clean, and is fairly easy to read with few distracting error corrections.	Poor  Ideas were not expressed in a clear and organized fashion.  Letter typed, clean, but confusing to read with many distracting error corrections.	UNACCEPTABLE No letter
Interview 10 %	Excellent  Interview expressed in a clear and organized fashion. 10 questions were asked 	Good Interview expressed in a mostly organized fashion.9 questions were asked 	Fair Interview expressed in a mostly organized fashion. 8 questions were asked 	Poor Interview done in a disorganized fashion. 7 questions were asked 	UNACCEPTABLE No interview or less than 7 questions
Self reflection 25 %	Excellent Reflection is completed clearly, and clarifying comments are presented. Includes self graded rubric	Good Reflection is completed clearly, but clarifying comments were not presented. Includes self graded rubric	Fair Reflection is partially completed , and clarifying comments are presented. Includes self graded rubric	Poor Reflection is partially completed, but clarifying comments were not presented. Contains self graded rubric	UNACCEPTABLE No reflection completed, or accurately done and/or No self graded rubric
Grammar and Mechanics 5 %	Excellent There are no misspelled words within the product.	Good There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.	Fair There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.	Poor There are many misspelled words within the product.	UNACCEPTABLE CANNOT MAKE SENSE OF SENTENCES
Sources cited 5 %	Excellent Sources used in project correctly cited for each graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Good Sources used in project correctly cited for most graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Fair Sources used in project correctly cited for some graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	Poor Sources used in project Incorrectly cited for few graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.	UNACCEPTABLE Information presented was all cut and pasted (graphics allowed)

Keywords:

Career Development Folder

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric