- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Generic Research Writing Based Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Generic Research Writing Based Rubric LEB A02 Music Mogul Contract Rubric Code: J35CA4 By wardirvin Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Generic Writing Rubric
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 88 pts	Fair 78 pts	Poor 70 pts	No Effort 0 pts
Content 40 %	Excellent Contract included all eleven key points. Research uncovered additional considerations that were then addressed	Good Contract included all eleven key points.	Fair Contract included nine or ten key points.	Poor Contract included six to eight points.	No Effort Fewer than six points were addressed.
Thoroughness 30 %	Excellent All components of each key point are clearly identified. Full descriptions are given for more than the eleven key points described in assignment.	Good All components of each key point are clearly identified. Full descriptions are given.	Fair Components of nine or ten key point are clearly identified. Fair descriptions are given.	Poor Components of seven or eight key point are clearly identified. Poor descriptions are given.	No Effort Components of fewer than seven key points are identified.
Writing - Grammar 15 %	Excellent Original text with no spelling and/or grammar errors	Good Original text with up to two spelling and/or grammar errors	Fair Original text with up to four spelling and/or grammar errors	Poor Original text up to six and/or grammar errors	No Effort More than six spelling and/or grammar errors
Writing - Organization 10 %	Excellent All key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Good All but two key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Fair Fewer than half key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Poor Key points are described in a confusing manner with little organization.	No Effort No attempt was made
Citations 5 %	Excellent All external references were correctly identified and had footnotes. Footnotes followed APA Guidles 100%	Good Up to 80% of the external references were correctly identified. Footnotes mostly followed APA Guidelines.	Fair Up to 50% of the external references were correctly identified. Footnotes mostly followed APA Guidelines 100%	Poor Less than 50% of external referencers were correctly identified. Footnotes somewhat APA Guidelines	No Effort No citations given.