Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Film Evaluation and Review rubric

iRubric: Film Evaluation and Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Film Evaluation and Review Film Evaluation and Review The assignment is to view a film and integrate terminology used within a literature unit. Provide a summary and analysis of the film. Write a personal response and reflection of the film. Use terminology/vocabulary from the film within the response. Rubric Code: HXB878X By tannka Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Qualities and Criteria These are the components of the response that are evaluated.
	Poor This category will reflect that the student did not put forth effort or understanding of the assignment. Paper does not follow guidelines. No assistance was sought for problems. Potentially failing paper. 0 pts	Fair A paper of fair quality will show some effort but lack analysis or structure qualities as presented in the guidelines. 1 pts	Good A good paper has the general structure and mechanics expressed in the guidelines with a few areas of weakness. A good paper could be made excellent with help from learning resources. 2 pts	Excellent An excellent paper follow all guidelines clearly and shows significant thought and effort. If the student struggled with an area, assistance with improvement was found. Mechanics are near perfect. 3 pts
Format of Paper 10 % -Organization <BR> -Followed Guidelines	Poor - Does not follow an organized outline of ideas<BR> -Guidelines for assignment are not followed.	Fair -Some outline attempted in organization of ideas<BR> -Some assignment guidelines are not followed.	Good -Outline is clear in presentation of ideas<BR> -Most assignment guidelines are followed	Excellent -Very clear and organized ideas<BR> -Strong presentation of paper outline<BR> -All assignment guidelines are followed
Content of Summary of Film 25 % -Notes main argument<BR> -Clear idea of what the film was about<BR> -Supports summary with facts, statistics, researched points presented, personal anecdotes, and presentation of credibility of sources	Poor -Does not give reader a summary of the film<BR> -Main point not addressed -Summary of evidence presented not addressed.	Fair -Gives a general idea of the film but lacks in clarity of main point. -Lacks a summary of evidence and sources presented.	Good -Gives detailed explanation of the film's main point. -Has sufficient summary of evidence and sources presented.	Excellent -Gives reader a clear understanding of the film along with the main point appropriate amount of space, citing numerous examples of evidence and sources from the film.
Analysis + terminology use 25 % -Critically reviews the film's presentation of facts, statistics, and information<BR> - -Shows critical thinking	Poor -Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occured<BR> -Does not effectively integrate use of the vocabulary from the unit.	Fair -Uses some of the unit terminology but limited critical thinking about the film's purpose	Good -Provides new perspective and relation to the issues addressed in the film. <BR> -Uses terminology learned from the course in appropriate ways	Excellent -Provides evidence of cricital thinking <BR> -Avoids simple explanations of terminology but rather relates the terminology to the film and the purpose
Personal Reflection 30 % -Addresses personal reaction to film<BR> -Acknowledges any emotion or thought of a personal nature	Poor -No personal reaction included<BR> -Inappropriate use of reflection taking up majority of the paper	Fair -Some reflection but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the film	Good -Good overall reaction is presented <BR> -Reflection of what was personally learned from the film and the relation to the course	Excellent -Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the film<BR> -Expression of some personal reaction to the film
Mechanics 10 % -Grammar<BR> -Spelling<BR> -Punctuation<BR> -Paragraphing	Poor -Many spelling errors<BR> -Difficulty understanding ideas due to improper grammar<BR> -Significant punctuation errors -All one paragraph	Fair -Spelling errors<BR> -Several grammatical errors<BR> -Punctuation errors<BR> -Paragraphing is illogical	Good -Generally appropriate usage of grammar and punctuation<BR> -Evidence of spell check used<BR> -Paragraphing is logical	Excellent -Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors<BR> -Limited punctuation errors<BR> -Paragraphing is effective

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Communication rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16