Skip to main content
iRubric: Autoethnography Dance History Project Rubric

iRubric: Autoethnography Dance History Project Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Autoethnography Dance History Project Rubric 
Autoethnography Project Rubric
Submit an autoethnography project in one of several modalities with research paper. 4-6 page paper to support project. Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the topic. Project will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research in addition to students personal narration, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics.
Rubric Code: HXB7C45
By Hostj17
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Dance  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Autoethnography
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Content

Excellent

--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is analyzed thoughtfully, not just summarized
--Narratives are written with effective technique, well-chosen details, and subtle organization
Good

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Most researched information is analyzed, some just summarized
--Narratives are written with acceptable technique, good details, and effective organization
Fair

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Some information is analyzed, much is just summarized
--Narratives are written with fair technique, good details, and fair organization
Poor

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Information is merely stated or summarized
---Narratives are written with poor technique, minimal details, and poor organization
Unsatisfactory

--Unclear and inappropriate organization, lacking transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is merely summarized
--Narratives are written with ineffective technique, ill-chosen details, and little or no organization
Presentation

Excellent

--Poised and articulate
- Clearly explains content of project
--Confident in speech
-Clearly organized
--Confident Eye Contact
Good

- Poised and articulate
- Clearly explains content of project
--Confident in speech
-Clearly organized
--Confident Eye Contact
Fair

- Is fairly Poised and articulate
- Moderately explains content of project
--Some Confidence in speech
-Is somewhat organized
-Fair Eye Contact
Poor

- has poor poise and has difficulty articulating points
- poorly explains content of project
--poor confident while speech
-Poorly organized
--Poor Eye Contact
Unsatisfactory

-Is not Poised
- does not explain content of project well
--No Confidence
-Not Organized
--No Eye Contact
Grammar and Mechanics

Excellent

No grammatical or mechanical errors.
Good

--Only one run-on sentence OR only one fragment
--4 or less spelling errors
-- 4 or less punctuation or capitalization errors
Fair

--2 run-on sentences OR fragments
--5 or more spelling errors
--5 or more punctuation or capitalization errors
Poor

--8 or more run-on sentences OR fragments
--More than 8 spelling errors
-- More than 8 punctuation or capitalization errors
Unsatisfactory

--Grammar and mechanical errors interfere with conveyance of message
Quality of research

Excellent

An advanced understanding of historical content and historical context.
Good

Some understanding of historical content and historical context.
Fair

A basic understanding of historical content and historical context.
Poor

Limited understanding of historical content and historical context.
Unsatisfactory

--No evidence of research and no demonstrated understanding of historical content and historical context.
Works Cited/Citations

Excellent

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

--No sources properly cited in paper and/or bibliography.
Unsatisfactory

--No source citations
Project

Excellent

Composition of project is clearly developed. Demonstrates a high degree of understanding of the use of compositional form to structure dance work.
Good

Composition of project is developed. Demonstrates a solid understanding of the use of compositional form to structure dance work .
Fair

Demonstrates an understanding of the use of compositional form to structure dance work. Adequate demonstration of compositoinal structure.
Poor

Demonstrates some understanding of the use of compositional form to structure dance work. Limited demonstration of compositional structure.
Unsatisfactory

Demonstrates a limited understanding of the use of compositional form to structure dance work. Poor compositional structure.



Keywords:
  • Research, autoethnography



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16