Skip to main content

iRubric: Substance Abuse Societal Topic Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Substance Abuse Societal Topic Project 
This rubric is meant to help guide in the creation of your Project. Each category in the far left column represents a component of the project that will be taken into consideration when calculating the final grade for this assignment. Review the rubric carefully before, during and after the creation of the Technology presentation, to ensure that all intended elements of your presentation have been represented and all other criteria have been met.
Rubric Code: HXAX574
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent

100 pts

Good

85 pts

Fair

70 pts

Poor

50 pts

UNACCEPTABLE

0 pts

Content On Topic Chosen
20 %

Excellent

Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 10 items of information, including but not limited to
Approved topic is chosen
Good

Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 8 items of information, including but not limited to,
Approved topic is chosen
Fair

Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed. A minimum of 7 items of information, including but not limited to,
Approved topic is chosen
Poor

Topic is mentioned, but less than 6 items of information were provided.
Approved topic is chosen
UNACCEPTABLE

LITTLE OR NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AND/OR UNAPPROVED TOPIC IS DISCUSSED
Comparison/Contrast.
15 %

Excellent

Extensive comparison/contrast using specific examples gained from research
Good

Comparison/Contrast is somewhat discussed but more explanation is needed, used specific examples gained from research
Fair

Comparison/contrast is slightly discussed but more information is needed. generalization was given instead of specific examples
Poor

Minimally comparison/contrast is provided, generalizations provided without specific examples
UNACCEPTABLE

NO COMPARISON/CONTRAST IS PROVIDED
Opinion on Resolution
15 %

Excellent

Topic is discussed clearly and in an organized manner. include minimum of 10 items of information leading into your proposed resolution
Good

Topic is somewhat discussed and in an organized manner. include minimum of 8 items of information leading into your proposed resolution
Fair

Explanation of topic is slightly discussed but more information is needed.A minimum of 7 items of information, items of information leading into your proposed resolution
Poor

Topic is minimally discussed to include minimum of 6 items items of information leading into your proposed resolution
UNACCEPTABLE

less than 6 items of information or No coherent opinion on resolution of issue.
Technology Product used
20 %

Excellent

Technology app is advanced (list provided in Instructions). Text is easy to read. Colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 4-5 graphics/charts are added. 2 applications are embedded within this product
Good

Technology selected is average(list provided in Instructions) . Text is easy to read. Black and white colors and designs are used to enhance presentation. 2-3 graphics and only One additional application is embedded within.
Fair

Technology selected is minimally different than Power Point or not approved in advance. Little effort put into enhancing visual.
4-6 graphics and/or 0 applications are included
Poor

Technology used is powerpoint or Google slide. Visuals are not easy to read. The amount of text is too great or too small for the space provided. No visual appeal. less than 2 graphics and/or 0 applications
UNACCEPTABLE

NO TECHNOLOGY PRODUCT PROVIDED
Self reflection
10 %

Excellent

Reflection is completed clearly, and clarifying comments are presented.
Good

Reflection is completed clearly, but clarifying comments were not presented.
Fair

Reflection is partially completed , and clarifying comments are presented.
Poor

Reflection is partially completed, but clarifying comments were not presented.
UNACCEPTABLE

No reflection completed, or accurately done.
Grammar and Mechanics
10 %

Excellent

There are no misspelled words within the product.
Good

There is less than 2 misspelled words within the product.
Fair

There are less than 4 misspelled words within the product.
Poor

There are many misspelled words within the product.
UNACCEPTABLE

CANNOT MAKE SENSE OF SENTENCES
Sources cited
10 %

Excellent

Sources used in project correctly cited for each graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Good

Sources used in project correctly cited for most graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Fair

Sources used in project correctly cited for some graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
Poor

Sources used in project Incorrectly cited for few graphic/information produced. NO cut and paste unless it was a graphic.
UNACCEPTABLE

Information presented was all cut and pasted (graphics allowed)



Keywords:
  • Substance Abuse CAMH







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243