Skip to main content

iRubric: Critical Analysis Final Project Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Critical Analysis Final Project Rubric 
Oral Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code: HXA8C67
By BZPost
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentation Rubric B
  Excellent

10 pts

Proficient

8 pts

Basic

6 pts

Below Basic

4 pts

Organization

Excellent

-Specifies introduction and conclusion
-Sequences material within the body
-Presents cohesive content
Proficient

-Details introduction and conclusion
-Sequences material within the body
-Presents content
Basic

-Introduces material with inconsistentencies
Below Basic

-Alludes to introduction with sparse or incomplete information
Language

Excellent

-Varies style and creates voice
-Appropriate to audience
-Creative and effective use of schemes and tropes
Proficient

-Demonstrates control of conventions
-Appropriate to audience
-Evident use of schemes and tropes
Basic

-Demonstrates partial control of conventions
-Appropriate to audience
-Attempts at use of schemes and tropes
Below Basic

-Demonstrates emerging language
-Appropriate to audience
-Schemes and tropes not evident
Graphics

Excellent

-Provide a concrete example of the argument
-Encourage interest
-Enhance memory
-Synthesize the task
Proficient

-Follow the argument
-evidence of visuals
-Visuals too sparse or too cluttered to enhance memory
-Interpret the task
Basic

-Whole excerpts of the argument are simply pasted into the visual
-Confuse the audience or cause the audience to look away
-Misrepresent the task
Below Basic

-The entire argument is pasted into the presentation or
are not present
-Violate audience and
speaker boundaries
Content

Excellent

-Argument is logical, detailed, well-researched, and evident of argumentative format with use of rhetorical strategies
Proficient

-Argument is logical, researched and evident of argumentative format
Basic

-Argument logic is faulty not fully researched
Below Basic

-Argument logic is heavily flawed with no attention to research
MLA Works Cited

Excellent

-Develops with careful attention to detail
-Formatted properly
Proficient

-Addresses most elements
-Formatted
Basic

-Demonstrates emerging awareness of citing
-Demonstrates emerging attempt at formatting
Below Basic

-Missing Works Cited
-Lacks substantive research



Keywords:
  • Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243