iRubric: Colonial Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Colonial Project

STUDENTS WILL DO RESEARCH ONLINE ON VARIOUS TOPICS FROM THE COLONIAL ERA. STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE A REPORT ON THEIR WIKI SPACE PAGE ON THEIR SPECIFIED TOPIC.

Rubric Code: H8CA77

By alexdawn

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

COLONIAL PROJECT
	Fail 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
ORGANIZATION	Fail Report is copied either completely or in part directly from source, i.e., Copyright infringement!	Poor Reports formatting and organization of material is confusing on wiki site.	Fair Report is not well organized and loses focus in areas.	Good Report is organized, but does not fully explain subject.	Excellent Report is organized and the information is clearly presented.
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE	Fail Because report is copied either completely or in part directly from the sources student is unclear on subject matter.	Poor Report does not explain subject.	Fair Report only has the basic information about subject.	Good Report has most of the important information about the subject.	Excellent Report explains subject clearly.
CITED INFORMATION	Fail No work cited.	Poor	Fair WORK CITED	Good	Excellent WORK CITED PERFECTLY
WRITING - GRAMMAR	Fail Because report is copied either completely or in part directly from the sources spelling and grammar is not students own work.	Poor Report has many spelling or grammatical errors.	Fair Report has some spelling or grammatical error.	Good Report has few spelling or grammatical error.	Excellent Report has no spelling or grammatical errors.
CONTENT ACCURACY	Fail Because report was copied either completely or in part directly from the sources content accuracy cannot be counted.	Poor The report does not state correct information	Fair The report has is largely correct factually	Good The report has 1 factual error.	Excellent The report has no factual errors and clearly states topic according to COLONIAL subject area.
EFFORT	Fail GROUP: STUDENT DID NOT DO THEIR PART OF THE ASSIGNED PROJECT INDIVIDUAL: DID NOT USE TIME WELL. DID NO WORK.	Poor GROUP: STUDENT RARELY WORKED WELL IN GROUP. DID MINIMAL WORK ON THE PROJECT INDIVIDUAL: DID MINIMAL WORK ON THE PROJECT	Fair STUDENT WORKED WELL MOST OF THE TIME WITHIN GROUP. INDIVIDUAL: DID SATISFACTORY WORK.	Good GROUP: STUDENT FULLY WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS/ HER SHARE OF WORK. INDIVIDUAL: STUDENT FULLY RESPONSIBLE.	Excellent GROUP: STUDENT A LEADER IN GROUP. INDIVIDUAL: STUDENT GOES ABOVE AND BEYOND EXPECTATIONS.