iRubric: HPE & Digital Technologies: Website & Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

HPE & Digital Technologies: Website & Presentation

Digital Presentation - PA Core

Research, technology, oral presentation, rubric, health education

Rubric Code: H24X6CB

By JarrydX

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Group Assessment
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 7 pts	Good 9 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Organization	Poor There is no logical progression of ideas.	Fair Content is vague and is not presented in a logical progression. This makes it hard to follow the content and main idea.	Good Content is mostly presented with a logical progression of supporting information.	Excellent There is a logical progression of ideas.
Relationships	Poor Few or no content connections made and/or relationships made are vague and need much more explaining to make sense.	Fair Several connections are missing, and/or the relationship between the survey data and observations and intervention plan is confusing.	Good Does a good job explaining the relationship between the survey data and observations and the intervention plan, but needs a little more.	Excellent Does an excellent job explaining the relationship between the survey data and observations and the intervention plan.
Technology Presentation	Poor Technology distracted from conveying appropriate content. Use of font, charts, colour graphics, or effects, but these are distracting & interfere with the content presentation.	Fair Technology did not assist in conveying thoughts well. Fine use of font, charts, colour graphics, or effects, but these sometimes distract from the content.	Good Good use of technology to convey thoughts, but it could be improved a little. Good use of font, charts, colour, graphics, or effects to enhance project.	Excellent Excellent use of technology to convey thoughts. Colour, font, charts, graphics, or effects enhances the project. The layout is visually pleasing and is appropriate for the topic.
Oral Presentation	Poor Transitions between group members interrupted the flow of the presentation. Group members' contributions were allocated unevenly.	Fair Transitions between group members somewhat interrupted the flow of the presentation. Group member contributions were allocated unevenly.	Good Transitions between group members did not impede the flow of the presentation. Group member contributions were allocated somewhat evenly.	Excellent Transitions between group members were seamless. Group member contributions were allocated evenly.
Resources	Poor Minimal resources included. Resources are unrelated to the argument. Links and CRAP Tests are inaccurate.	Fair Some resources were included that somewhat supported the argument. Resources included links and attempted CRAP test.	Good All three resources included and mostly supported the argument. Resources included links and a CRAP Test.	Excellent All three resources are included and strongly support the argument. Resources included links and an accurate CRAP Test.
Individual Assessment
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Oral Presentation	Poor Poor communication skills. The individual used poor verbal and no visual communication skills to convey their argument.	Fair Fair communication skills. The individual used verbal and little to no visual communication skills to convey their argument.	Good Good communication skills. The individual used verbal and some visual communication skills to convey their argument.	Excellent Excellent communication skills. The individual used verbal and visual communication skills to convey their argument.
Evaluation	Poor Poor reflection. The individual's responses are confusing and don't show an understanding of areas they did well with and areas that could be improved.	Fair Fair reflection. The individual shows some understanding of areas they did well with; improvements are somewhat confusing.	Good Good reflection. The individual recognises areas they did well with and some areas that could be improved in their project	Excellent Excellent reflection. The individual recognises areas they did well with and areas that could be improved in their project
Participation & Collaboration	Poor Poor participation. The individual completed minimal group responsibilities.	Fair Fair participation. The individual mostly completed their group responsibilities.	Good Good participation. The individual mostly completed their group responsibilities.	Excellent Excellent participation. The individual completed all their group responsibilities.

Keywords:

Digital Presentation, Health Campaign

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric